AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs Intel Core i5-3330 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and Intel Core i5-3330 are separated by nearly six years of silicon evolution, yet they land in the same performance tier. The Ryzen 3 2200G posts an average benchmark score of 1202, while the Core i5-3330 sits at 1200, a negligible 0.2% difference that places both squarely in the 34th percentile of all CPUs. The data suggests a generational stalemate in raw compute, but the underlying architectures tell a different story about where each chip excels.

The Verdict

The benchmark data presents a clear split: the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is the choice for anyone prioritizing modern platform features and integrated graphics capability, while the Intel Core i5-3330 offers a legacy option with a larger shared cache. The single head-to-head benchmark available—Cinebench R15 multicore—shows the Ryzen 3 2200G scoring 577 against the Core i5-3330’s 351, a decisive 64.4% advantage. This is not a close contest in that specific workload. However, the average benchmark scores being nearly identical (1202 vs 1200) indicates that other tests, not shown in the head-to-head data, must balance the scales.

For a user building a new system, the Ryzen 3 2200G is the logical pick. It uses the modern AMD Socket AM4 platform with DDR4 memory support, features a Radeon Vega 8 integrated GPU, and has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. The Core i5-3330, by contrast, is locked to Intel Socket 1155 and DDR3 memory, with no such flexibility. The data implies that the Ryzen chip’s architectural advantages in multi-threaded tasks are offset by the Intel chip’s strengths in other areas, likely single-threaded efficiency or cache-sensitive workloads, but the only direct comparison available heavily favors AMD.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies from different eras. The Ryzen 3 2200G is built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, packing 4,950 million transistors into a 210 mm² die. Its Zen architecture, codenamed Raven Ridge, is a 2000-series part from AMD. The Core i5-3330 uses Intel’s 22 nm process, with a 133 mm² die size, and is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture. The transistor count for the Intel chip is not provided, but the die size difference is stark—210 mm² versus 133 mm²—suggesting the AMD chip dedicates significant silicon to its integrated graphics.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. The Ryzen 3 2200G features 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 per core, but only 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-3330 has smaller per-core caches—64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2—but compensates with a larger 6 MB shared L3 cache. This 2 MB difference in L3 could favor the Intel chip in workloads with repetitive data access patterns. Memory support also diverges: the Ryzen chip uses DDR4 with a rated bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the Core i5-3330 is limited to DDR3 with no bandwidth figure provided. The AMD part also offers PCIe Gen 3 with 8 CPU lanes, while the Intel part provides 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics is another major divergence. The Ryzen 3 2200G includes Radeon Vega 8, a relatively capable iGPU for its time, whereas the Core i5-3330 has Intel HD 2500. Both are listed as desktop parts with ECC memory not supported on either. The Ryzen chip’s process node advantage—14 nm versus 22 nm—contributes to its lower 65 W TDP compared to the Intel chip’s 77 W.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data points to distinct strengths. The Ryzen 3 2200G wins decisively in the only head-to-head test: Cinebench R15 multicore, where it scores 577 versus 351. This 64.4% delta suggests AMD’s architecture handles multi-threaded rendering workloads with far greater efficiency, likely due to its newer process node and higher clock speeds (3.50 GHz base, 3.70 GHz boost versus 3.00 GHz base, 3.20 GHz boost on the Intel chip).

The Core i5-3330, despite losing the head-to-head, must win elsewhere to achieve parity in average benchmark scores. Its larger 6 MB L3 cache compared to the Ryzen’s 4 MB could give it an edge in gaming or database workloads that rely heavily on cached data. The Intel chip’s additional PCIe lanes (16 versus 8) might also make it more suitable for systems with multiple expansion cards, though this is not directly benchmarked. The Ryzen 3 2200G’s integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics means it wins in any scenario requiring modern GPU features without a discrete card, while the Intel HD 2500 is a more basic solution.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher multi-core benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G scores 577 in Cinebench R15 multicore, compared to the Intel Core i5-3330’s 351, a 64.4% difference favoring AMD.

Q: Are the average benchmark scores significantly different?

A: No. The Ryzen 3 2200G averages 1202, while the Core i5-3330 averages 1200, a 0.2% difference that is effectively a tie.

Q: Which processor supports DDR4 memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen 3 2200G supports DDR4 memory, with dual-channel support and 46.9 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-3330 is limited to DDR3.

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-3330 overclockable?

A: No. The multiplier is locked on the Intel chip. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G has an unlocked multiplier.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The Ryzen 3 2200G uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, while the Core i5-3330 uses Intel’s 22 nm process. This contributes to the Ryzen chip’s lower 65 W TDP versus 77 W.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The Ryzen 3 2200G features Radeon Vega 8, while the Core i5-3330 has Intel HD 2500. The data does not provide benchmark scores for these iGPUs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison in the data is Cinebench R15 multicore, and it is a landslide. The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G scores 577, while the Intel Core i5-3330 manages 351. That is a delta of 64.4% in AMD’s favor. This test stresses all four cores and threads on both CPUs, and the results are telling. The Ryzen chip’s higher base clock (3.50 GHz versus 3.00 GHz) and boost clock (3.70 GHz versus 3.20 GHz) certainly contribute, but the architectural efficiency of Zen on a 14 nm node versus Ivy Bridge on 22 nm is the likely differentiator.

This single win gives the Ryzen 3 2200G a 1-0 record in head-to-head benchmarks, with zero wins for the Core i5-3330. Yet the average benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The Ryzen chip’s average of 1202 is derived from Geekbench multicore (3086) and singlecore (1001) scores, plus the Cinebench R15 result. The Intel chip’s average of 1200 includes different tests—Cinebench R20 multicore (1464) and singlecore (206), Cinebench R23 multicore (3486) and singlecore (492), and the same Cinebench R15 multicore (351). Without overlapping tests beyond the one, the overall parity suggests the Intel chip compensates for its poor R15 showing with stronger results in newer Cinebench versions or other workloads not directly compared.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The Ryzen 3 2200G has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 3.70 GHz, while the Core i5-3330 runs at 3.00 GHz base and 3.20 GHz boost. TDP is 65 W for AMD versus 77 W for Intel. Sockets are incompatible: AMD Socket AM4 versus Intel Socket 1155. Process nodes are 14 nm (GlobalFoundries) versus 22 nm (Intel). The Ryzen chip’s die is 210 mm² with 4,950 million transistors; the Intel die is 133 mm² with no transistor count listed.

Cache configurations diverge: the Ryzen has 96 KB L1 and 512 KB L2 per core, with 4 MB shared L3; the Intel has 64 KB L1 and 256 KB L2 per core, with 6 MB shared L3. Memory support is DDR4 for AMD and DDR3 for Intel, with bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s only listed for the former. PCIe lanes differ: 8 for AMD, 16 for Intel, both Gen 3. Integrated graphics are Radeon Vega 8 versus Intel HD 2500. The Ryzen chip has an unlocked multiplier; the Intel chip is locked. Release dates are February 2018 for AMD and September 2012 for Intel. The Ryzen 3 2200G has a launch MSRP of $99; no MSRP is listed for the Core i5-3330. The AMD part is marked as Active in production; no production status is given for the Intel chip.