AMD Ryzen 3 2200G vs AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 2200G and AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B are both 14nm AMD Zen parts with four cores and Radeon Vega 8 graphics, but they target different segments of the market. The 2200G is a desktop processor with a 65W TDP and a socketed AM4 platform, while the V1605B is an embedded part with a 15W TDP on the FP5 package. Benchmark data shows a split decision: the V1605B wins in multi-threaded workloads due to its 8 threads, while the 2200G takes single-core performance. This analysis breaks down the architectural and specification differences, then interprets the head-to-head results to determine which processor fits which use case.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear trade-off between raw multi-threaded throughput and single-core responsiveness. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B wins the multi-core Cinebench R15 test with a score of 654, which is 11.8% higher than the Ryzen 3 2200G’s 577. This advantage is directly attributable to the V1605B’s 8 threads versus the 2200G’s 4 threads; despite a lower base clock of 2000.00 MHz, the additional threads allow it to process more parallel workloads. For users running heavily threaded applications—such as software compilation, video encoding, or virtualized environments—the V1605B is the stronger choice based on this benchmark.

Conversely, the Ryzen 3 2200G dominates in single-core performance. Its Cinebench R15 single-core score of 145.55 is 13.7% higher than the V1605B’s 128. This is a significant margin, driven by the 2200G’s higher boost clock of 3.70 GHz compared to the V1605B’s 3.60 GHz. For everyday tasks, legacy software, and gaming—which often rely on single-thread performance—the 2200G provides noticeably snappier results. The 2200G also has a higher base clock of 3.50 GHz versus 2000.00 MHz, which further supports its single-thread lead.

The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: the 2200G scores 1202, while the V1605B scores 1196, a difference of only 0.5%. Both processors sit at the 34th percentile of all CPUs, indicating they are mid-pack performers. The nearest rivals for the 2200G include the Intel Core i5-3330 and AMD Athlon PRO 200GE, both with average scores of 1200 (0.2% delta). The V1605B’s closest competitors are the AMD Opteron 3365 and AMD Athlon PRO 300U, with deltas of 0.2%. This suggests that neither chip has a decisive overall performance advantage; the choice depends entirely on workload.

The verdict is straightforward: pick the Ryzen 3 2200G if single-core speed and desktop compatibility are priorities. Pick the Ryzen Embedded V1605B if multi-threaded performance and power efficiency are more critical, given its 15W TDP versus the 2200G’s 65W TDP. The V1605B’s 8 threads make it a better fit for always-on embedded systems or compact builds where thermal constraints are tight, while the 2200G’s higher clock speeds benefit interactive use.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B wins in multi-core Cinebench R15 with a score of 654, which is 11.8% higher than the Ryzen 3 2200G’s 577. This is due to the V1605B having 8 threads versus the 2200G’s 4 threads.

Q: Which processor is faster in single-core tests?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 2200G is faster, scoring 145.55 in Cinebench R15 single-core, which is 13.7% higher than the V1605B’s 128. The 2200G’s higher boost clock of 3.70 GHz contributes to this lead.

Q: Are these processors similar in overall performance?

A: Yes, their average benchmark scores are nearly identical. The 2200G scores 1202, while the V1605B scores 1196, a difference of only 0.5%. Both sit at the 34th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What are the power consumption differences?

A: The Ryzen Embedded V1605B has a TDP of 15W, while the Ryzen 3 2200G has a TDP of 65W. This makes the V1605B significantly more power-efficient, suitable for embedded or low-power systems.

Q: Do they have the same integrated graphics?

A: Yes, both processors feature Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics. This means graphical capabilities are identical on paper, though actual performance may vary due to memory bandwidth and clock speeds.

Q: Which processor is better for gaming?

A: Based on the data, the Ryzen 3 2200G is likely better for gaming due to its 13.7% higher single-core score in Cinebench R15. Many games are sensitive to single-thread performance, and the 2200G’s boost clock of 3.70 GHz provides an advantage.

Architecture Differences

Both processors are built on the same Zen architecture, but they belong to different generations and codenames. The Ryzen 3 2200G is part of the 2000 series, with the codename Raven Ridge, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is from the 1000 series, with the codename Great Horned Owl (part of the Zen family). Both use a 14nm process node from GlobalFoundries, with identical transistor counts of 4,950 million and die sizes of 210 mm². This means the fundamental silicon is the same, but the packaging and feature sets diverge.

The most significant architectural difference is in thread support. The 2200G has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the V1605B has 4 cores and 8 threads. This implies the V1605B supports Simultaneous Multi-Threading (SMT), allowing each core to handle two threads, whereas the 2200G does not. This explains the V1605B’s multi-core advantage despite its lower clocks.

Cache configurations also differ notably. The 2200G has 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The V1605B has 128 KB of L1 cache per core and only 2 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L1 cache on the V1605B may help with certain workloads, but the 2200G’s double L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB) could improve performance for data-intensive tasks by reducing memory latency.

The integrated GPU is identical in name: both feature Radeon Vega 8. However, the memory support differs in that the 2200G has a specified memory bandwidth of 46.9 GB/s, while the V1605B’s memory bandwidth is not provided. Both support DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but the actual bandwidth may vary based on the platform.

The socket and platform are completely different. The 2200G uses AMD Socket AM4, a mainstream desktop socket, while the V1605B uses AMD Socket FP5, which is a BGA (ball grid array) package typically soldered to embedded motherboards. This means the 2200G is user-upgradeable and supports a wider range of motherboards, while the V1605B is fixed to its board.

The 2200G has an unlocked multiplier, allowing for overclocking, while the V1605B does not. This is a key feature for enthusiasts who want to push performance beyond stock settings. The 2200G also has a PCIe implementation of Gen 3 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the V1605B’s PCIe configuration is not specified in the data.

Specification Differences

The following table highlights the key specification differences between the two processors:

• Threads: The 2200G has 4 threads, while the V1605B has 8 threads.
• Base Clock: The 2200G runs at 3.50 GHz, while the V1605B runs at 2000.00 MHz.
• Boost Clock: The 2200G boosts to 3.70 GHz, while the V1605B boosts to 3.60 GHz.
• TDP: The 2200G has a TDP of 65W, while the V1605B has a TDP of 15W.
• Socket: The 2200G uses AMD Socket AM4, while the V1605B uses AMD Socket FP5.
• L1 Cache: The 2200G has 96 KB per core, while the V1605B has 128 KB per core.
• L3 Cache: The 2200G has 4 MB shared, while the V1605B has 2 MB shared.
• Memory Bandwidth: The 2200G has 46.9 GB/s, while the V1605B has no specified value.
• Unlocked Multiplier: The 2200G is unlocked, while the V1605B is locked.
• Release Date: The 2200G launched on 2018-02-11, while the V1605B launched on 2018-02-20.
• Launch MSRP: The 2200G has a launch MSRP of $99, while the V1605B has no MSRP listed.

These differences paint a picture of two distinct products: the 2200G is a desktop part designed for performance and overclocking, while the V1605B is an embedded part optimized for low power and multi-threading.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data shows one win for each processor, making the comparison a tie in terms of victory count. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B takes the multi-core Cinebench R15 test, scoring 654 against the Ryzen 3 2200G’s 577. This is a delta of -11.8% for the 2200G, meaning the V1605B is 11.8% faster. This result is consistent with the V1605B’s 8 threads, which allow it to handle more parallel work. In multi-threaded rendering or encoding tasks, this translates to a meaningful performance advantage, despite the V1605B’s lower base clock of 2000.00 MHz.

The Ryzen 3 2200G wins the single-core Cinebench R15 test decisively, with a score of 145.55 versus the V1605B’s 128. This is a 13.7% delta in favor of the 2200G. The higher boost clock of 3.70 GHz (versus 3.60 GHz) and the higher base clock of 3.50 GHz are the primary drivers. For applications that cannot utilize multiple threads—such as older games, spreadsheet macros, or light desktop use—the 2200G will feel noticeably more responsive.

Beyond the Cinebench R15 results, the two processors have overlapping benchmark suites. The 2200G has Geekbench scores of 3086 (multi-core) and 1001 (single-core), while the V1605B has Cinebench R23 scores of 3160 (multi-core) and 841 (single-core). These tests are not directly comparable due to different workloads and scoring scales, but they reinforce the overall pattern: the V1605B excels in multi-threaded throughput, while the 2200G has a single-core edge.

The average benchmark scores again show parity: the 2200G averages 1202, while the V1605B averages 1196. This is a 0.5% difference, within the noise of benchmarking. Both processors rank at the 34th percentile, meaning they outperform roughly one-third of all CPUs. Their nearest rivals are similarly matched—the 2200G’s closest competitor, the Intel Core i5-3330, scores 1200 (0.2% delta), while the V1605B’s rival, the AMD Opteron 3365, scores 1194 (0.2% delta). This suggests that neither chip is a clear overall winner; the decision must be based on specific workload requirements.

In summary, the multi-core benchmark favors the V1605B by 11.8%, while the single-core benchmark favors the 2200G by 13.7%. These are substantial margins in both directions, making the choice workload-dependent. If you need maximum parallel processing power in a low-power envelope, the V1605B is the data-backed pick. If you need single-thread speed and desktop flexibility, the 2200G wins.