AMD PRO A10-8770E vs Intel Pentium G4600T Comparison

The AMD PRO A10-8770E and Intel Pentium G4600T are two 35-watt desktop processors that land at exactly the same average benchmark score of 895, placing both in the 24th percentile of all CPUs. Despite identical aggregate performance, the head-to-head data reveals a consistent, if narrow, edge for the Intel part across every tested workload, while the AMD chip counters with a fundamentally different core and graphics architecture.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Pentium G4600T wins all five head-to-head comparisons, but the margins are remarkably tight. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Pentium scores 262 against the AMD PRO A10-8770E’s 258, a 1.5% advantage. That pattern holds across the entire Cinebench suite: R20 multi-core shows 1092 versus 1075 (1.6% delta), R23 multi-core shows 2602 versus 2560 (1.6% delta), and single-core tests follow suit with R20 at 154 versus 151 (1.9% delta) and R23 at 367 versus 361 (1.6% delta).

The largest single margin is just 1.9% in Cinebench R20 single-core, meaning neither chip ever opens a decisive lead. What is notable is the consistency: the Pentium G4600T does not merely win one or two tests; it wins every single benchmark by a similar, small amount. This suggests a stable architectural efficiency advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk. The AMD part’s best result is its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 258, which trails the Pentium’s 262 by only four points — a margin that could easily fall within run-to-run variation on many systems.

Interestingly, the AMD PRO A10-8770E also recorded Geekbench scores of 1291 multi-core and 572 single-core, tests the Pentium G4600T does not have listed in this dataset. Those Geekbench numbers place the AMD chip in the same performance tier as its rival, reinforcing that the two processors are effectively peers despite the Pentium’s sweep of the Cinebench suite.

Architecture Differences

The two chips could hardly be more different in design philosophy. The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses the Excavator architecture on a 28 nm process from GlobalFoundries, featuring four physical cores and four threads. Its base clock is 2.80 GHz with a boost clock of 3.50 GHz. The Intel Pentium G4600T uses Kaby Lake on a 14 nm process from Intel, with only two physical cores but four threads via Hyper-Threading, running at a fixed 3.00 GHz with no boost capability.

The cache layouts diverge sharply. AMD provides 320 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with no L3 cache at all. Intel provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and crucially, 3 MB of shared L3 cache. That L3 cache is likely a significant factor in the Pentium’s consistent wins, as it gives the Intel part a larger, faster pool of data to draw from during multi-threaded workloads.

Process technology also tells a story: AMD’s 28 nm Excavator is two generations behind Intel’s 14 nm Kaby Lake. The AMD chip integrates 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die, while Intel does not report transistor count or die size in this data. The AMD part uses socket AM4, while Intel uses socket 1151. Both support DDR4 memory in dual-channel mode with identical 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, and neither supports ECC memory.

Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD PRO A10-8770E carries Radeon R7 graphics, while the Intel Pentium G4600T carries Intel HD 630. Both parts are locked (multiplier not unlocked), target the desktop segment, and are listed as Active production status.

The Verdict

Strictly from the benchmark data, the Intel Pentium G4600T is the faster processor in every measured Cinebench workload, with margins ranging from 1.5% to 1.9%. The AMD PRO A10-8770E’s only listed advantage is its Geekbench presence, where it scores 1291 multi-core and 572 single-core, but no direct comparison exists for that test against the Pentium. The average benchmark score for both is identical at 895, and both sit at the 24th percentile.

The choice comes down to what the data does not show. The AMD chip offers four physical cores versus the Intel’s two, which could matter in workloads that scale with physical core count rather than thread count, though the benchmark results do not demonstrate any such advantage. The Intel part’s 3 MB of shared L3 cache is a clear structural benefit that likely explains its consistent edge. For pure CPU throughput as measured by Cinebench, the Pentium G4600T wins. For users who prioritize the AMD platform’s socket or its Radeon R7 integrated graphics, the PRO A10-8770E remains a viable alternative, but the performance data favors Intel.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD PRO A10-8770E | Intel Pentium G4600T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 2 |

| Threads | 4 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.80 GHz | 3.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.50 GHz | None |

| Architecture | Excavator | Kaby Lake |

| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| Transistors | 3,100 million | Not reported |

| Die Size | 250 mm² | Not reported |

| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | None | 3 MB (shared) |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 | Intel HD 630 |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 3, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Release Date | Not reported | 2017-01-02 |

| Part Number | AD877BAHM44AB | SR35R |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock speed?

A: The Intel Pentium G4600T runs at 3.00 GHz base, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E runs at 2.80 GHz base. The AMD chip offers a 3.50 GHz boost clock, but the Intel part has no boost capability.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The Intel Pentium G4600T has 3 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD PRO A10-8770E has no L3 cache, relying instead on 2 MB of L2 and 320 KB of L1.

Q: What are the Cinebench R23 multi-core scores?

A: The Intel Pentium G4600T scores 2602, and the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 2560, giving the Intel part a 1.6% advantage.

Q: Do both processors have the same TDP?

A: Yes, both the AMD PRO A10-8770E and the Intel Pentium G4600T are rated at 35 watts TDP.

Q: Which chip has more physical cores?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has four physical cores, while the Intel Pentium G4600T has two physical cores. Both support four threads total.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770E includes Radeon R7 graphics, while the Intel Pentium G4600T includes Intel HD 630 graphics.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Pentium G4600T wins every head-to-head Cinebench test: R15 multi-core (262 vs 258), R20 multi-core (1092 vs 1075), R20 single-core (154 vs 151), R23 multi-core (2602 vs 2560), and R23 single-core (367 vs 361). Its 3 MB of shared L3 cache and 14 nm process give it a structural edge that shows up consistently across all measured workloads.

The AMD PRO A10-8770E wins on physical core count, offering four cores versus the Intel’s two. It also has a higher peak clock speed at 3.50 GHz boost versus the Pentium’s fixed 3.00 GHz, though this does not translate into any benchmark victory in the provided data. The AMD part additionally provides Geekbench scores of 1291 multi-core and 572 single-core, tests that are not available for the Intel chip, leaving open the possibility that the AMD part could lead in that specific benchmark suite.

For workloads that are heavily dependent on L3 cache, the Intel Pentium G4600T is clearly the better choice based on the consistent Cinebench results. For users who need four physical cores or who are committed to the AM4 socket platform, the AMD PRO A10-8770E offers those features, though the data shows no performance benefit from them in the tests performed. The two chips are effectively tied at 895 average score and 24th percentile, making the Pentium’s narrow sweep of the Cinebench suite the deciding factor in most CPU-bound scenarios.