AMD PRO A10-8770E vs Intel Pentium G4560T Comparison

The AMD PRO A10-8770E and Intel Pentium G4560T are two low-power desktop processors aimed at similar tasks, both locked to a 35 W thermal envelope and supporting dual-channel DDR4 memory. Benchmark data shows a remarkably close contest, with the AMD part winning six of seven head-to-head tests, but the Intel chip taking the single-core crown and offering a fundamentally different architecture. The choice between them depends on whether you prioritize the AMD’s consistent multi-threaded edge or the Intel’s superior per-core performance and modern process node.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD PRO A10-8770E wins the majority of the benchmark suite, but the margins are almost uniformly slim. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the AMD scores 258 against the Intel’s 256, a lead of just 0.8%. That pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where AMD posts 1075 versus 1068, a 0.7% advantage. The single-core Cinebench results are equally tight: AMD leads 151 to 150 in R20 single-core (0.7%) and 361 to 359 in R23 single-core (0.6%). Even in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD’s 2560 edges out the Intel’s 2544 by 0.6%. These are not decisive victories; they suggest the two chips trade blows within run-to-run variance territory.

The clearest separation comes in Geekbench multi-core, where the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 1291 against the Pentium’s 1237, a 4.4% win. That is the largest delta in the entire head-to-head set and indicates that the AMD’s four physical cores provide a more substantial advantage in this particular workload than in the Cinebench suite. However, the Intel Pentium G4560T strikes back in Geekbench single-core, scoring 594 versus AMD’s 572, a 3.7% lead in the opposite direction. This single-test win is the only one for Intel across the seven benchmarks, and it highlights the per-core efficiency gap between the two designs.

Looking at the broader context, both processors sit at the 24th percentile of all CPUs, meaning they are entry-level performers by modern standards. The AMD’s average benchmark score is 895, placing it exactly level with the Intel Core i5-5300U and Intel Pentium G4600T, and just 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U. The Pentium’s average score of 887 ties it with the AMD PRO A8-8650B, and it sits within 0.2% of the Intel Core i7-860. In practical terms, neither chip will crush modern workloads; they are both firmly in the “light productivity and basic computing” category.

Architecture Differences

The AMD PRO A10-8770E is built on the Excavator architecture, codenamed Carrizo, using a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die, which is a large physical footprint for a low-power part. The chip has four cores and four threads, with a base clock of 2.80 GHz and a boost clock of 3.50 GHz. Cache consists of 320 KB of L1 and 2 MB of L2, with no L3 cache present. The integrated graphics are Radeon R7-class, and the processor uses the AMD Socket AM4.

The Intel Pentium G4560T is a Kaby Lake design on a 14 nm process at Intel. It has two cores and four threads, with a base clock of 2.90 GHz and no boost clock available. The cache hierarchy is different: 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and a shared 3 MB L3 cache. The integrated graphics are Intel HD 610, and the socket is Intel Socket 1151. The process node difference is significant — 28 nm versus 14 nm — which explains why the Intel die is much smaller, though the fact pack does not list its transistor count or die size.

Memory support is identical on paper: both use DDR4 on a dual-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, and neither supports ECC memory. Both are Gen 3 PCIe, but the Intel specifies 16 lanes for the CPU only, while the AMD does not list lane details. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is off the table for both. The AMD has a production status of Active, and the Intel is also Active, but the Intel carries a release date of 2017-01-02, while the AMD’s release date is not listed.

The Verdict

From the data alone, the AMD PRO A10-8770E is the better overall performer in multi-threaded workloads, but the margins are small enough that real-world differences will be difficult to notice. The AMD wins six of seven benchmarks, with the largest single win being 4.4% in Geekbench multi-core. If your workload is heavily threaded — video encoding, rendering, or running multiple virtual machines — the AMD’s four physical cores give it a measurable, if modest, edge.

The Intel Pentium G4560T, however, wins the single-core Geekbench test by 3.7%, and its 14 nm process node suggests better power efficiency per transistor, though the fact pack provides no direct power or thermal data beyond the shared 35 W TDP. For tasks that rely on single-thread speed — older games, office applications, or lightly threaded software — the Intel chip is the stronger pick. Its 2.90 GHz base clock is also slightly higher than the AMD’s 2.80 GHz base, and it does not need a boost clock to hit that frequency.

The AMD’s integrated Radeon R7 graphics are likely superior to the Intel HD 610 for casual gaming, but the fact pack does not include any graphics benchmarks, so that remains a qualitative observation. Both chips are entry-level, and neither will satisfy demanding users. The decision comes down to whether you trust the AMD’s multi-core consistency or the Intel’s single-core edge and newer manufacturing process.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the Intel Pentium G4560T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the biggest benchmark difference between the two?

A: The largest delta is in Geekbench multi-core, where the AMD PRO A10-8770E scores 1291 versus the Intel’s 1237, a 4.4% lead for AMD.

Q: Does the Intel Pentium G4560T win any benchmark?

A: Yes, the Intel wins Geekbench single-core with a score of 594 against the AMD’s 572, a 3.7% advantage.

Q: Do both processors use the same memory configuration?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 memory on a dual-channel bus with 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, and neither supports ECC memory.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770E uses a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries, while the Intel Pentium G4560T uses a 14 nm process at Intel.

Q: Are either of these processors overclockable?

A: No, both have a locked multiplier and are not unlocked for overclocking.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD PRO A10-8770E is the pick for multi-threaded productivity. Its 4.4% Geekbench multi-core win is the most decisive result in the comparison, and it maintains a lead in every Cinebench multi-core test, though by less than 1%. If your daily driver involves compiling code, batch photo processing, or running multiple browser tabs with heavy extensions, the AMD’s four physical cores will handle the parallel load slightly better. The Radeon R7 integrated graphics also give it an edge for light gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks, assuming the driver support is adequate.

The Intel Pentium G4560T wins where single-thread speed matters most. Its 3.7% Geekbench single-core victory is the counterpoint to the AMD’s multi-core lead, and its 2.90 GHz base clock is higher than the AMD’s 2.80 GHz base. For office documents, spreadsheet macros, or any legacy software that runs on a single thread, the Intel chip will feel snappier. The 14 nm process also suggests better thermal behavior under sustained load, though the fact pack does not provide specific temperature or power measurements beyond the shared 35 W TDP.

If you need the absolute best multi-core score in Geekbench, take the AMD. If you need the best single-core score and prefer a newer manufacturing node, take the Intel. The Cinebench results are too close to call a winner, with all margins under 1%, so those tests should not drive your decision.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD PRO A10-8770E | Intel Pentium G4560T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 2 |

| Threads | 4 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.80 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.50 GHz | None |

| Architecture | Excavator | Kaby Lake |

| Codename | Carrizo | Kaby Lake |

| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Intel |

| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | None | 3 MB (shared) |

| Transistors | 3,100 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 250 mm² | Not listed |

| Socket | AMD Socket AM4 | Intel Socket 1151 |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon R7 | Intel HD 610 |

| Release Date | Not listed | 2017-01-02 |

| Part Number | AD877BAHM44AB | SR35T |

The core count and cache layout are the defining differences. The AMD’s 4 cores and 2 MB of L2 cache suit parallel workloads, while the Intel’s 2 cores with hyper-threading and 3 MB of shared L3 cache favor latency-sensitive single-thread tasks. The AMD’s 3.50 GHz boost clock is a notable feature that the Intel lacks entirely, and the AMD’s larger die and transistor count reflect its older, less dense process. Both are locked, both are 35 W, and both are currently Active in production.