AMD PRO A10-8770E vs AMD Ryzen 3 3250U Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear split between the two processors, with the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U taking four of the five head-to-head benchmark wins, while the AMD PRO A10-8770E claims one decisive victory. The most striking result is in Cinebench R23 single-core, where the Ryzen 3 3250U scores 776 points against the PRO A10-8770E's 361 points, a massive 115% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire comparison and reflects a fundamental difference in per-thread performance between the two architectures.

In Geekbench single-core, the Ryzen 3 3250U again leads, posting 722 points versus 572 points for the PRO A10-8770E, a 26.2% margin. The multi-core Geekbench result follows the same pattern, with the Ryzen 3 3250U scoring 1467 against 1291, a 13.6% advantage. These results indicate that despite having only 2 cores and 4 threads, the Ryzen 3 3250U consistently outperforms the 4-core, 4-thread PRO A10-8770E in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads in these particular tests.

However, the PRO A10-8770E does have one significant win. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 2560 against the Ryzen 3 3250U's 2010, a 21.5% advantage. This is an interesting reversal, given that the Ryzen 3 3250U wins the Geekbench multi-core test. The discrepancy suggests that the PRO A10-8770E's four physical cores can be leveraged effectively in certain rendering workloads, whereas the Ryzen 3 3250U's two cores with simultaneous multithreading may not scale as well in that specific benchmark.

The Cinebench R15 multi-core test also favors the Ryzen 3 3250U, with a score of 353 versus 258, a 36.8% lead. This further complicates the picture, as the older Cinebench version shows the opposite trend from R23 multi-core. The data suggests that workload characteristics and benchmark versions play a significant role in determining which processor comes out ahead.

Looking at the average benchmark scores, the Ryzen 3 3250U sits at 908, while the PRO A10-8770E is at 895. Both processors occupy the same 24th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they are positioned similarly in the overall performance hierarchy. The Ryzen 3 3250U's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-4330T and Intel Core i3-10110Y, both at 908 with 0% delta, as well as the AMD PRO A12-9800E at 910 (-0.3%) and the AMD A10-7860K at 904 (0.4%). The PRO A10-8770E's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-5300U and Intel Pentium G4600T, both at 895 with 0% delta, plus the AMD Ryzen 3 3200U at 893 (0.2%) and the Intel Core i3-6100 at 888 (0.7%).

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U as the stronger overall performer in most tested scenarios, with a clear edge in single-core workloads and a mixed but generally positive showing in multi-core tests. The 115% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core is decisive, and the 26.2% advantage in Geekbench single-core reinforces this conclusion. For users whose workloads depend heavily on single-threaded performance, such as everyday productivity tasks, web browsing, and lightly threaded applications, the Ryzen 3 3250U is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements.

The PRO A10-8770E, however, demonstrates its value in multi-core rendering workloads, specifically in Cinebench R23 multi-core where it leads by 21.5%. This suggests that users running heavily parallel rendering tasks that respond well to additional physical cores may find the PRO A10-8770E more suitable, despite its lower scores in other tests. The 4-core, 4-thread configuration provides a raw core count advantage that can be exploited in the right circumstances.

From a platform perspective, the Ryzen 3 3250U is a mobile processor with a 15 W TDP, while the PRO A10-8770E is a desktop processor with a 35 W TDP. This difference in power envelope, combined with the benchmark results, indicates that the Ryzen 3 3250U delivers higher performance per watt in most tests. The PRO A10-8770E's higher power draw does not translate into consistent performance advantages, making the Ryzen 3 3250U the more efficient option based on the data.

Neither processor has a recorded launch MSRP in the database, so no pricing information is available for comparison. Both are listed as active in production, and both occupy the 24th percentile among all CPUs, meaning they are positioned at a similar overall performance level despite their architectural differences.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different AMD architectures. The Ryzen 3 3250U is based on the Zen architecture with the codename Dali, part of the 3000 series, while the PRO A10-8770E uses the Excavator architecture with the codename Carrizo, part of the A10 generation. This architectural gap is significant, as Zen represents a modern design while Excavator is an older generation.

The process node difference is substantial: the Ryzen 3 3250U is built on a 14 nm process, while the PRO A10-8770E uses a 28 nm process. Both are manufactured by GlobalFoundries, but the smaller node allows the Ryzen 3 3250U to pack 3,500 million transistors into a 148 mm² die, whereas the PRO A10-8770E has 3,100 million transistors on a much larger 250 mm² die. This transistor density advantage contributes to the Ryzen 3 3250U's superior performance characteristics.

Core and cache configurations differ markedly. The Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 cores and 4 threads, with 96 KB of L1 cache per core and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, plus a shared 4 MB L3 cache. The PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores and 4 threads, with 320 KB of L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, but no L3 cache at all. The absence of L3 cache in the PRO A10-8770E likely contributes to its lower performance in latency-sensitive workloads.

Clock speeds are also different. The Ryzen 3 3250U has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.50 GHz, while the PRO A10-8770E has a base clock of 2.80 GHz and the same 3.50 GHz boost. Despite the higher base clock on the PRO A10-8770E, the Ryzen 3 3250U still achieves significantly better single-core scores, highlighting the architectural efficiency of Zen over Excavator.

Memory support is similar in some respects: both support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses and 38.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory. Both use PCIe Gen 3. The integrated graphics differ, with the Ryzen 3 3250U featuring Radeon Vega 3 and the PRO A10-8770E featuring Radeon R7. The sockets are different as well: the Ryzen 3 3250U uses AMD Socket FP5, while the PRO A10-8770E uses AMD Socket AM4.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has better single-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U wins decisively in single-core tests. In Cinebench R23 single-core, it scores 776 versus 361 for the PRO A10-8770E, a 115% advantage. In Geekbench single-core, it scores 722 versus 572, a 26.2% lead.

Q: Does the PRO A10-8770E win any benchmarks?

A: Yes, the PRO A10-8770E wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, scoring 2560 versus 2010 for the Ryzen 3 3250U, a 21.5% advantage. This is the only head-to-head benchmark where it comes out ahead.

Q: How do their core counts and threads compare?

A: The Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores and 4 threads. Despite the core count disadvantage, the Ryzen 3 3250U wins most multi-core tests, except for Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Ryzen 3 3250U has a TDP of 15 W, while the PRO A10-8770E has a TDP of 35 W. The Ryzen 3 3250U achieves better results in most benchmarks while drawing less power.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory?

A: Both support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses and 38.4 GB/s memory bandwidth. Neither supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The Ryzen 3 3250U is built on a 14 nm process, while the PRO A10-8770E uses a 28 nm process. Both are manufactured by GlobalFoundries.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 3250U wins in most benchmark categories, particularly those that measure single-threaded performance. Its 115% lead in Cinebench R23 single-core and 26.2% lead in Geekbench single-core make it the preferred choice for everyday computing tasks, office applications, web browsing, and any software that relies heavily on single-thread execution. The Ryzen 3 3250U also wins in Geekbench multi-core by 13.6% and Cinebench R15 multi-core by 36.8%, showing that its two cores with four threads can outperform the PRO A10-8770E's four physical cores in many multi-threaded scenarios.

The PRO A10-8770E wins specifically in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where its four physical cores provide a 21.5% advantage. This makes it a reasonable choice for workloads that are specifically optimized for multiple physical cores and respond well to the Excavator architecture's execution characteristics. Users running Cinebench R23 or similar rendering workloads that favor this pattern might see better results with the PRO A10-8770E.

For mobile use, the Ryzen 3 3250U is clearly the more appropriate option given its 15 W TDP and mobile market segment, whereas the PRO A10-8770E is designed for desktop use with a 35 W TDP. The Ryzen 3 3250U's smaller die size (148 mm² versus 250 mm²) and lower transistor count (3,500 million versus 3,100 million) combined with a more advanced 14 nm node indicate a more efficient design overall.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Ryzen 3 3250U has 2 cores and 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8770E has 4 cores and 4 threads. The base clock differs, with the Ryzen 3 3250U at 2.60 GHz and the PRO A10-8770E at 2.80 GHz, though both boost to 3.50 GHz. The TDP is significantly different: 15 W for the Ryzen 3 3250U versus 35 W for the PRO A10-8770E.

The sockets are different: the Ryzen 3 3250U uses AMD Socket FP5, while the PRO A10-8770E uses AMD Socket AM4. The architectures differ fundamentally, with Zen (Dali) for the Ryzen 3 3250U and Excavator (Carrizo) for the PRO A10-8770E. The process nodes are 14 nm versus 28 nm, both from GlobalFoundries.

Cache configurations are notably different. The Ryzen 3 3250U has 96 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 4 MB shared L3. The PRO A10-8770E has 320 KB L1, 2 MB L2, and no L3 cache. The integrated graphics differ as well: Radeon Vega 3 for the Ryzen 3 3250U and Radeon R7 for the PRO A10-8770E.

The market segments differ, with the Ryzen 3 3250U being a mobile processor and the PRO A10-8770E being a desktop processor. The release dates differ, with the Ryzen 3 3250U released on 2020-01-05, while the PRO A10-8770E has no recorded release date. The part numbers are YM3250C4T2OFG for the Ryzen 3 3250U and AD877BAHM44AB for the PRO A10-8770E. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and both support DDR4 memory with dual-channel buses and 38.4 GB/s bandwidth, with no ECC support and PCIe Gen 3.