AMD PRO A10-8770 vs Intel Core i5-2380P Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-2380P wins every single recorded comparison against the AMD PRO A10-8770. Across five Cinebench tests, spanning multi-core and single-core workloads, the Intel part holds a consistent, narrow lead. The largest margin appears in the Cinebench R20 single-core test, where the i5-2380P scores 183 against the AMD's 180, a 1.7% advantage. Every other test, including Cinebench R15 multi-core, R20 multi-core, R23 multi-core, and R23 single-core, shows the Intel chip ahead by 1.6%. This uniformity suggests a fundamental per-clock efficiency edge rather than a workload-specific anomaly.

Looking at the raw scores, the Intel Core i5-2380P posts 311 in Cinebench R15 multi-core versus 306 for the AMD PRO A10-8770. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, the gap is 1297 to 1276. The R23 multi-core test shows 3090 against 3040, and the single-core R23 result is 436 versus 429. While the percentage deltas are small, they are consistent across the board. The data shows no test where the AMD part closes the gap or flips the result.

The average benchmark score reinforces this picture. The Intel chip averages 1063 across its recorded tests, while the AMD part averages 1046. That places the i5-2380P 1.6% ahead on average, matching the head-to-head deltas. Both processors sit at the 29th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same performance tier relative to the broader market. The nearest rivals for the Intel part include the Intel Core i5-4570TE at 1062 (0.1% behind) and the Intel Xeon W3580 at 1064 (0.1% ahead), showing the i5-2380P is tightly clustered with those chips. The AMD PRO A10-8770's closest competitor is the Intel Core i5-6350HQ at 1046, a perfect 0% delta, with the AMD Athlon X4 950 at 1047 (0.1% ahead) and the AMD PRO A10-9700 at 1045 (0.1% behind).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770 has a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-2380P boosts to 3.40 GHz. The AMD part also has a higher base clock at 3.50 GHz versus 3.10 GHz for the Intel.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-2380P outperform the AMD PRO A10-8770 in all recorded benchmarks?

A: Yes. The head-to-head data shows the Intel chip wins all five Cinebench tests: R15 multi-core (311 vs 306), R20 multi-core (1297 vs 1276), R20 single-core (183 vs 180), R23 multi-core (3090 vs 3040), and R23 single-core (436 vs 429). The win count is 5 for Intel and 0 for AMD.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-2380P averages 1063 points across its benchmark suite, while the AMD PRO A10-8770 averages 1046 points. That is a 1.6% difference in favor of the Intel chip.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD PRO A10-8770 includes Radeon R7 integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-2380P has no integrated graphics listed in the database.

Q: What memory types do these processors support?

A: The Intel Core i5-2380P supports DDR3 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The AMD PRO A10-8770 supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Q: Are both processors at the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the Intel Core i5-2380P and the AMD PRO A10-8770 are recorded at the 29th percentile among all CPUs in the database, indicating they perform in the same overall tier despite the Intel chip's consistent head-to-head wins.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-2380P wins in every benchmark category recorded. For multi-core workloads, the data shows a 1.6% advantage in Cinebench R15, R20, and R23. For single-core workloads, the Intel chip leads by 1.7% in R20 and 1.6% in R23. There is no recorded test where the AMD PRO A10-8770 takes the lead.

However, the AMD PRO A10-8770 has advantages outside raw CPU throughput that matter for specific use cases. It includes Radeon R7 integrated graphics, meaning systems built around it do not require a separate graphics card for basic display output. This makes it suitable for office desktops, media playback, or light productivity where discrete graphics are unnecessary. The AMD chip also has a lower TDP at 65 watts versus 95 watts for the Intel part, which can translate to easier cooling requirements and lower system power draw in compact builds.

The Intel Core i5-2380P, by contrast, has no integrated graphics, so it requires a discrete GPU for any display output. Its advantage lies purely in compute performance, where it edges out the AMD part across the board. For users running CPU-bound tasks such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or compilation, the Intel chip delivers slightly better results in every recorded test.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification category. The Intel Core i5-2380P uses the Intel Socket 1155, while the AMD PRO A10-8770 uses AMD Socket AM4. The Intel chip is built on a 32 nm process at Intel's foundry, whereas the AMD part uses a 28 nm process at GlobalFoundries. The Intel chip has 1,160 million transistors on a 216 mm² die, while the AMD chip packs 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die.

Clock speeds favor the AMD part. The AMD PRO A10-8770 has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The Intel Core i5-2380P has a base clock of 3.10 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. Despite this clock deficit, the Intel chip still wins all benchmarks, indicating higher instructions per clock.

Cache configurations also differ. The Intel chip has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 320 KB of total L1 cache and 2 MB of L2 cache, with no L3 cache listed. Memory support differs as well: the Intel chip uses DDR3, while the AMD chip uses DDR4 with a recorded memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s.

Thermal design power favors the AMD part at 65 watts versus 95 watts for the Intel chip. The Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD chip lists PCIe Gen 3 without a lane count. Neither processor has unlocked multipliers, and neither supports ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The architecture gap between these two chips is substantial. The Intel Core i5-2380P is based on Sandy Bridge, a 2012-era microarchitecture, while the AMD PRO A10-8770 uses Excavator, part of the Carrizo generation. Both have 4 cores and 4 threads, but the underlying designs are fundamentally different.

The Intel chip uses a 32 nm process node from Intel, with 1,160 million transistors on a 216 mm² die. The AMD chip uses a 28 nm process node from GlobalFoundries, with 3,100 million transistors on a 250 mm² die. The AMD part packs 2.7 times more transistors, but that does not translate into a performance win in the recorded benchmarks.

Cache architecture diverges sharply. The Intel chip employs a three-level cache hierarchy: 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and a shared 6 MB L3 cache. The AMD chip has a simpler hierarchy with 320 KB total L1 and 2 MB total L2, and no L3 cache at all. The lack of L3 cache on the AMD part may contribute to its benchmark deficit despite higher clock speeds.

The AMD PRO A10-8770 includes Radeon R7 integrated graphics, a feature entirely absent from the Intel Core i5-2380P. This makes the AMD chip a complete system-on-chip solution for basic display tasks, while the Intel chip requires a discrete GPU. The AMD part also supports DDR4 memory with 38.4 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the Intel chip is limited to DDR3.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the Intel Core i5-2380P is the faster processor in every recorded benchmark. Its wins span multi-core and single-core tests, with consistent 1.6% to 1.7% margins over the AMD PRO A10-8770. The average benchmark score of 1063 versus 1046 confirms the trend. For users prioritizing raw CPU performance in Cinebench workloads, the Intel chip is the correct choice.

However, the AMD PRO A10-8770 has legitimate appeal for different use cases. Its integrated Radeon R7 graphics eliminate the need for a discrete GPU in basic systems, and its 65 watt TDP is 32% lower than the Intel chip's 95 watt TDP. The AMD part also supports DDR4 memory, which is a more modern standard than the DDR3 required by the Intel chip.

The decision hinges on what the system must do. For CPU-bound tasks where the benchmark scores matter, the Intel Core i5-2380P is the winner, even though its lead is modest. For a low-power desktop with integrated graphics and DDR4 support, the AMD PRO A10-8770 offers a more complete package, accepting a small performance penalty. Both processors sit at the 29th percentile among all CPUs, so neither is a high-end choice. The Intel chip is the performance pick; the AMD chip is the integrated, power-efficient alternative.