AMD Opteron 6380 vs Intel Core i7-1060G7 Comparison

Intel Core i7-1060G7 vs AMD Opteron 6380: the data shows a clean sweep. The AMD Opteron 6380 wins all six recorded benchmarks, but by margins so narrow that the practical difference is almost negligible. The Opteron’s average benchmark score is 1643, placing it in the 40th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core i7-1060G7 averages 1591, sitting in the 39th percentile. This is a matchup defined by small, consistent leads rather than overwhelming performance gaps.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Opteron 6380 takes every single head-to-head benchmark, but the largest victory is a mere 3.3%. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Opteron scores 336 against the Core i7’s 325, a delta of -3.3%. The same pattern repeats across the board. For Cinebench R15 multicore, the Opteron posts 572 versus 554, a 3.1% edge. The single-core R15 result is 80 against 78, a 2.5% lead. In Cinebench R20 multicore, the Opteron’s 2386 beats 2310, a 3.2% margin. Cinebench R23 multicore shows 5683 against 5500, also 3.2% ahead. Finally, Cinebench R23 single-core gives the Opteron 802 versus 776, another 3.2% advantage.

These results indicate that the Opteron 6380 is consistently faster, but the deltas are small enough that they would likely be imperceptible in real-world use. The Core i7-1060G7 never wins a single test, yet its scores are close enough to keep the comparison competitive. Notably, the Opteron’s advantage is uniform across both single-core and multi-core workloads, suggesting a general performance edge rather than a workload-specific strength. The nearest rival data reinforces this: the Opteron’s closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-5700HQ, scores 1645, a 0.1% difference, while the Core i7-1060G7’s nearest rival, the Intel Core i3-8300T, scores 1586, a 0.3% difference. Both CPUs sit in a crowded performance band where small margins define rankings.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the AMD Opteron 6380 is the clear winner on raw performance. It leads in all six benchmarks, with margins between 2.5% and 3.3%. Its average benchmark score of 1643 is 3.3% higher than the Core i7-1060G7’s 1591, and it achieves a higher percentile ranking at 40 versus 39. For any workload where Cinebench scores are representative, the Opteron is the faster processor.

However, the verdict is not simply about speed. The Core i7-1060G7 is a mobile processor with a 9W TDP, designed for thin and light laptops, while the Opteron 6380 is a server/workstation chip with a 115W TDP. The data does not include power consumption benchmarks, but the TDP figures alone suggest vastly different operating envelopes. The Core i7 is meant for efficiency, while the Opteron is meant for sustained server loads. If the decision is purely about benchmark scores, choose the Opteron. If the decision involves portability and power constraints, the Core i7’s lower TDP is a decisive factor, even though it loses every performance test. The Opteron’s launch MSRP was $1088, though this is a historical figure and not a current purchase consideration.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Opteron 6380 has an average score of 1643, while the Intel Core i7-1060G7 averages 1591. The Opteron leads by 3.3%.

Q: What is the largest performance difference in the head-to-head tests?

A: The largest difference is in Cinebench R20 single-core, where the Opteron 6380 scores 336 and the Core i7-1060G7 scores 325, a delta of -3.3%.

Q: Does the Core i7-1060G7 win any benchmark?

A: No, the Core i7-1060G7 loses all six recorded benchmarks. The Opteron 6380 wins every test.

Q: What are the TDP differences between the two?

A: The Intel Core i7-1060G7 has a TDP of 9, while the AMD Opteron 6380 has a TDP of 115. This indicates a substantial difference in power consumption and heat output.

Q: Which CPU supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Opteron 6380 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core i7-1060G7 does not.

Q: How do these CPUs compare to their nearest rivals?

A: The Opteron 6380’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-5700HQ (avg score 1645, delta -0.1%), while the Core i7-1060G7’s nearest rival is the Intel Core i3-8300T (avg score 1586, delta 0.3%). Both CPUs are close to their immediate competitors.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ significantly in nearly every specification. The Core i7-1060G7 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Opteron 6380 has 16 cores and 16 threads. The Core i7 has a base clock of 1000.00 MHz and a boost clock of 3.80 GHz, whereas the Opteron has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 3.40 GHz. The Core i7’s TDP is 9, while the Opteron’s is 115. The Core i7 uses the Intel BGA 1440 socket, while the Opteron uses AMD Socket G34. The Core i7 supports DDR4 memory, while the Opteron supports DDR3. The Core i7 has a memory bus of Quad-channel, and so does the Opteron, but the Opteron has a recorded memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, while the Core i7 has no recorded memory bandwidth. The Core i7 uses PCIe Gen 3, while the Opteron uses Gen 2. The Core i7 has integrated Iris Plus graphics, while the Opteron has no integrated graphics. The Core i7 is a mobile processor, while the Opteron is a server/workstation processor. The Core i7 is still active in production, while the Opteron is end-of-life. The Core i7 has no launch MSRP, while the Opteron has a launch MSRP of $1088.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap is wide. The Core i7-1060G7 is based on Ice Lake, with the codename Ice Lake-Y, and falls under the Core i7 (Sunny Cove-Y) generation. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 123 mm². Its cache layout includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Opteron 6380, by contrast, uses the Piledriver architecture, codename Abu Dhabi, from the Opteron (Abu Dhabi) generation. It is manufactured on a 32 nm process by GlobalFoundries, with a transistor count of 2,400 million and a die size of 2x 315 mm². Its cache includes 768 KB of L1, 2 MB of L2 per module, and 8 MB of L3 per die. The Core i7 supports ECC memory? No, it does not. The Opteron does support ECC memory. The Core i7’s process node is three generations ahead in node size, but the Opteron compensates with a much higher core count and a larger physical die. The Core i7’s memory support is DDR4, while the Opteron uses DDR3, and the Opteron has a specified memory bandwidth of 59.7 GB/s, which the Core i7 lacks in the recorded data.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Opteron 6380 wins in every measured benchmark. It is faster in all six Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 2.5% to 3.3%. Its strength lies in raw compute performance, likely due to its 16 cores, though the single-core tests also favor it, indicating a general clock-for-clock efficiency advantage in these workloads. The Opteron’s server heritage shows in its ECC memory support and 59.7 GB/s memory bandwidth, making it suitable for server or workstation applications where data integrity and memory throughput are critical. Its 115W TDP is high, but for a fixed installation with adequate cooling, that is not a limiting factor.

The Intel Core i7-1060G7 wins in no benchmark, but its advantages are elsewhere. Its 9W TDP is a fraction of the Opteron’s 115W, making it suitable for mobile devices where power draw and heat dissipation are primary concerns. Its integrated Iris Plus graphics provide display output without a discrete GPU, which the Opteron lacks entirely. The Core i7 uses newer DDR4 memory and PCIe Gen 3, offering more modern connectivity standards. Its smaller die size and 10 nm process suggest better power efficiency per unit of performance, though the recorded data does not include efficiency benchmarks. For a laptop user, the Core i7 is the practical choice despite losing every performance test. For a server administrator who prioritizes raw compute and ECC support, the Opteron is the clear winner. The data shows that the Opteron is the faster processor, but the Core i7 is the more versatile and efficient part for portable use.