AMD Opteron 6282 SE vs Intel Core i7-10610U Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins in multi-core performance, the Intel Core i7-10610U or the AMD Opteron 6282 SE?

A: The Intel Core i7-10610U wins every recorded multi-core benchmark. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, it scores 561 versus 546 for the Opteron, a 2.7% lead. The margin is consistent at 2.6% in both R20 and R23 multi-core tests.

Q: How large is the single-core performance gap between the two chips?

A: The Intel part leads by 2.6% in Cinebench R15 single-core (79 vs 77) and by 2.8% in R20 single-core (330 vs 321). In R23 single-core, the lead is 2.6% (786 vs 766).

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-10610U has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Opteron 6282 SE has 16 cores and 16 threads. Despite having four times the core count, the Opteron cannot surpass the Intel chip in any benchmark.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-10610U boosts to 4.90 GHz, compared to the AMD Opteron 6282 SE's 3.30 GHz. The base clocks are 1.80 GHz for Intel and 2.60 GHz for AMD.

Q: Do the two CPUs support the same memory types?

A: No. The Intel chip supports both DDR3 and DDR4 in a dual-channel configuration, while the AMD Opteron supports only DDR3 but uses a quad-channel memory bus with a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-10610U has an average benchmark score of 1611, while the AMD Opteron 6282 SE scores 1569. Both sit at the 39th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core i7-10610U is built on the Comet Lake architecture, specifically the Comet Lake-U codename, using Intel's 14 nm process node. It is a mobile-oriented chip with 4 cores and 8 threads, meaning it supports hyper-threading. The AMD Opteron 6282 SE uses the Bulldozer architecture with the Interlagos codename, manufactured on a 32 nm process. It has 16 cores and 16 threads, with no simultaneous multi-threading.

The cache layouts diverge sharply. The Intel processor has 64 KB of L1 per core and 256 KB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Opteron has 768 KB of total L1, 2 MB of L2 per module, and 8 MB of L3 per die. The Opteron's transistor count is recorded as 2,400 million across a die size of 2x 315 mm², while the Intel chip has no listed transistor or die size data.

Memory support also differs. Intel supports both DDR3 and DDR4 with a dual-channel memory bus. AMD supports only DDR3 but with a quad-channel bus and a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The Intel chip has integrated UHD Graphics; the AMD Opteron has no integrated graphics. ECC memory support is absent on the Intel part but present on the AMD part. PCIe generation differs as well: Gen 3 for Intel versus Gen 2 for AMD.

Thermal design power is a major differentiator. The Intel Core i7-10610U has a TDP of 25 watts, while the AMD Opteron 6282 SE is rated at 140 watts. That 115-watt difference reflects the Opteron's server/workstation positioning versus the Intel chip's mobile segment. The sockets are incompatible: Intel BGA 1440 for the i7-10610U, AMD Socket G34 for the Opteron. Release dates are also far apart, with the Opteron launching in November 2011 and the Intel chip in April 2020.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a clean sweep for the Intel Core i7-10610U across all six Cinebench tests. The largest percentage margin comes in Cinebench R20 single-core, where Intel wins by 2.8% (330 vs 321). Every other test shows a 2.6% or 2.7% advantage for the Intel chip.

In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel part scores 561 against 546 for the Opteron, a 2.7% win. The single-core R15 test is closer: 79 vs 77, a 2.6% margin. Moving to R20, the multi-core results are 2338 for Intel and 2279 for AMD, again a 2.6% gap. The R20 single-core test gives Intel 330 and AMD 321, the largest relative difference in the set.

Cinebench R23 multi-core shows Intel at 5569 and AMD at 5427, a 2.6% lead. The R23 single-core test has Intel at 786 and AMD at 766, also 2.6%. The Intel chip wins all six head-to-head matchups, with zero wins recorded for the AMD Opteron 6282 SE.

These margins are modest but consistent. The Opteron's 16 cores do not translate into multi-core superiority; in fact, the 4-core Intel chip outperforms it in every multi-threaded workload tested. The single-core results are similarly one-sided, with Intel maintaining an edge of roughly 2.6% to 2.8% across all generations of the Cinebench suite.

The average benchmark scores corroborate the head-to-head results. Intel's average is 1611, while AMD's is 1569. That places the Intel chip 2.7% higher on average. Both processors rank at the 39th percentile among all CPUs in the database, meaning they occupy the same performance tier despite their architectural differences.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core i7-10610U | AMD Opteron 6282 SE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 16 |

| Threads | 8 | 16 |

| Base clock | 1.80 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.90 GHz | 3.30 GHz |

| TDP | 25 W | 140 W |

| Socket | Intel BGA 1440 | AMD Socket G34 |

| Architecture | Comet Lake | Bulldozer |

| Codename | Comet Lake-U | Interlagos |

| Process node | 14 nm | 32 nm |

| Transistors | Not listed | 2,400 million |

| Die size | Not listed | 2x 315 mm² |

| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 768 KB (total) |

| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per module) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 8 MB (per die) |

| Memory support | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR3 |

| Memory bus | Dual-channel | Quad-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | Not listed | 51.2 GB/s |

| ECC memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 3 | Gen 2 |

| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics | None |

| Market segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release date | 2020-04-01 | 2011-11-13 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $1019 |

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-10610U wins in every benchmark category recorded in the database. It holds a 2.6% to 2.8% advantage across all single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests. This makes it the better choice for any workload represented by the Cinebench suite, whether that is rendering, simulation, or general compute tasks that scale with both core count and single-thread performance.

The AMD Opteron 6282 SE does not win any head-to-head benchmark. However, it has structural advantages that are not captured by the Cinebench results. It supports ECC memory, which is critical for error-sensitive server workloads. It also has a quad-channel memory bus with a recorded bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, which could benefit memory-bound applications that are not represented in the benchmark set. Its 16 cores and 16 threads provide a higher raw thread count, which may be relevant for workloads that do not appear in the Cinebench suite.

For the Intel chip, the wins are in efficiency and modern platform features. The 25 W TDP is dramatically lower than the Opteron's 140 W, making it suitable for mobile and power-constrained environments. It supports DDR4 memory, has PCIe Gen 3, and includes integrated graphics, which eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display scenarios.

The Opteron's advantages are niche but real: ECC memory, higher memory bandwidth, and a higher core count. If the database included memory-intensive or ECC-dependent tests, the Opteron might show strengths. But based on the recorded Cinebench data, the Intel chip is superior in every measured dimension.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i7-10610U outperforms the AMD Opteron 6282 SE in every recorded benchmark. It wins all six head-to-head Cinebench tests, with margins ranging from 2.6% to 2.8%. Its average benchmark score of 1611 beats the Opteron's 1569 by 2.7%. Both chips sit at the 39th percentile, but the Intel part is consistently ahead within that tier.

Buyers should choose the Intel Core i7-10610U if they prioritize raw Cinebench performance, lower power consumption, modern memory support, or integrated graphics. The 25 W TDP versus 140 W makes it the obvious choice for mobile or energy-conscious deployments. Its support for both DDR3 and DDR4 provides flexibility, and PCIe Gen 3 is a generation ahead of the Opteron's Gen 2.

The AMD Opteron 6282 SE is the pick only if specific server features matter more than benchmark scores. It offers ECC memory support, a quad-channel memory bus with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth, and 16 physical cores. These features are not reflected in the Cinebench results, but they could be decisive for mission-critical or memory-bandwidth-sensitive workloads. Its launch MSRP was $1019, which is notable given it has been end-of-life for years.

For general compute performance as measured by the database, the Intel Core i7-10610U is the clear winner. The Opteron's core-count advantage does not translate into any benchmark victory. The verdict is straightforward: Intel wins on performance and efficiency; AMD retains a narrow niche for ECC and memory-bandwidth use cases.