AMD Opteron 4332 HE vs Intel Core i5-3570S Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data is unambiguous: the Intel Core i5-3570S wins every single head-to-head benchmark in the database against the AMD Opteron 4332 HE. Across five Cinebench workloads, the Intel part posts a consistent advantage of roughly 20%, with no workload where the AMD server chip manages to close the gap. The results show a clean sweep for the Intel side, with winsA recorded as 5 and winsB as 0.

Starting with the multi-core workloads, the Intel Core i5-3570S scores 402 in Cinebench R15 multi-core against the Opteron's 335, a 20% lead. The pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core, where Intel scores 1676 versus AMD's 1396, a 20.1% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel part reaches 3991 while the Opteron manages 3324, again a 20.1% advantage. These numbers are notable because the AMD Opteron 4332 HE has six physical cores and six threads, while the Intel Core i5-3570S has four cores and four threads. Despite the two-core deficit, the Intel chip outperforms the AMD part in every multi-threaded test, indicating that per-core efficiency and architecture advantages outweigh the AMD processor's raw core count.

Single-core results tell a similar story, though the margin varies slightly. In Cinebench R20 single-core, the Intel Core i5-3570S scores 236 versus the Opteron's 196, a 20.4% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 563 against AMD's 469, a 20% margin. These single-threaded results are particularly instructive because they isolate the architectural differences between the two designs. The Intel Ivy Bridge architecture delivers substantially higher instructions per clock in lightly threaded workloads, and the boost clock advantage (3.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz) only adds to that gap.

The average benchmark score in the database further reinforces the picture. The Intel Core i5-3570S records an average benchmark score of 1169, while the AMD Opteron 4332 HE averages 1144. The Intel part sits at the 33rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD chip sits at the 32nd percentile. These are close overall rankings, but the head-to-head measurements show that the Intel processor is consistently faster in the specific tests recorded.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each chip provides additional context. The Intel Core i5-3570S's nearest rival in the database is the Intel Core i7-2960XM, which matches it exactly at an average score of 1169 with a 0% delta. The AMD Opteron 6220 is also close at 1168, just 0.1% behind. On the AMD side, the Opteron 4332 HE's nearest rival is the Intel Core i7-2600S at 1146, a 0.2% gap, followed by the AMD Opteron 4284 at the same score. These rival comparisons show that both processors sit in the same performance neighborhood by average score, but the head-to-head workload results are what distinguish them clearly.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins the head-to-head benchmark comparison?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570S wins all five recorded head-to-head benchmarks against the AMD Opteron 4332 HE. The database records winsA as 5 and winsB as 0, with no workload where the AMD chip takes the lead.

Q: How large is the performance gap in multi-core workloads?

A: In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Intel chip scores 402 versus AMD's 335, a 20% difference. In Cinebench R20 multi-core, Intel scores 1676 versus 1396, a 20.1% margin. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, Intel scores 3991 versus 3324, also a 20.1% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Opteron's higher core count help it in any benchmark?

A: No. The AMD Opteron 4332 HE has 6 cores and 6 threads, while the Intel Core i5-3570S has 4 cores and 4 threads. Despite having two additional cores, the AMD chip loses every multi-core benchmark in the database, including Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 multi-core tests.

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-core performance?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570S leads in both recorded single-core tests. In Cinebench R20 single-core, Intel scores 236 versus AMD's 196, a 20.4% lead. In Cinebench R23 single-core, Intel scores 563 versus AMD's 469, a 20% margin.

Q: What are the overall percentile rankings for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-3570S sits at the 33rd percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the AMD Opteron 4332 HE sits at the 32nd percentile. Their average benchmark scores are 1169 for Intel and 1144 for AMD.

Q: Are there any benchmarks where the AMD Opteron 4332 HE was not tested?

A: Yes. The database does not record a Cinebench R15 single-core result for the AMD Opteron 4332 HE, nor does it record any Geekbench results for that chip. The Intel Core i5-3570S has Geekbench multi-core and single-core scores of 1793 and 632 respectively, which have no AMD counterpart for comparison.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear conclusion: the Intel Core i5-3570S is the faster processor in every measured workload. The five head-to-head benchmarks all favor Intel with margins between 20% and 20.4%, and this consistency across both multi-core and single-core tests indicates a fundamental performance advantage rather than a workload-specific quirk.

For users prioritizing raw application performance, particularly in Cinebench-style rendering workloads, the Intel Core i5-3570S is the definitive choice. The 20% lead in multi-core tests is substantial, especially given that the AMD chip has 50% more cores. The Intel processor achieves this with a lower base clock (3.10 GHz versus 3.00 GHz) but a higher boost clock (3.80 GHz versus 3.70 GHz), a smaller process node (22 nm versus 32 nm), and a smaller die (133 mm² versus 315 mm²).

The AMD Opteron 4332 HE does not win a single recorded benchmark. Its average benchmark score of 1144 trails the Intel chip's 1169, and its nearest rivals in the database are all Intel Core i7 and AMD Opteron parts that score within 0.4% of it. The Opteron's six cores do not translate into a multi-core win, which points to the Ivy Bridge architecture's superior efficiency per core and better clock scaling.

One factor to note is the market segment difference: the AMD Opteron 4332 HE is classified as a Server/Workstation part, while the Intel Core i5-3570S is a Desktop part. For workstation deployments that rely on the specific Cinebench workloads recorded here, the Intel chip would deliver higher throughput. The Intel part also includes integrated graphics (Intel HD 2500), while the AMD chip has no integrated graphics listed in the database.

The verdict is straightforward: the Intel Core i5-3570S wins on every recorded performance metric. The AMD Opteron 4332 HE's only advantage in the data is its higher core count and thread count, but that advantage does not manifest in any benchmark result.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification recorded in the database. The Intel Core i5-3570S has 4 cores and 4 threads, while the AMD Opteron 4332 HE has 6 cores and 6 threads. The Intel base clock is 3.10 GHz with a boost clock of 3.80 GHz; the AMD base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 3.70 GHz. Both are rated at a 65 W TDP.

The sockets are entirely different: the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1155, while the AMD chip uses AMD Socket C32. The Intel processor measures 133 mm² on a 22 nm process, while the AMD processor measures 315 mm² on a 32 nm process. The AMD chip lists 1,200 million transistors, while the Intel chip has no transistor count recorded. The Intel part has a part number of SR0T9, and the AMD part has a part number of OS4332OFU6KHK.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Intel Core i5-3570S has 64 KB L1 per core, 256 KB L2 per core, and 6 MB shared L3. The AMD Opteron 4332 HE has 288 KB total L1, 6 MB L2, and 8 MB shared L3. The Intel chip supports DDR3 memory on a dual-channel bus, while the AMD chip also supports DDR3 but has no memory bus width recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory according to the database.

The Intel chip includes integrated graphics (Intel HD 2500) and PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD chip has no integrated graphics and no PCIe information recorded. The Intel part is a Desktop market segment product, while the AMD part is a Server/Workstation product. The Intel release date is recorded as 2012-05-31, and the AMD release date is 2012-12-03.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant and helps explain the benchmark results. The Intel Core i5-3570S uses the Ivy Bridge architecture, built on a 22 nm process node by Intel. The AMD Opteron 4332 HE uses the Piledriver architecture, codenamed Seoul, built on a 32 nm process node. The smaller process node gives Intel a transistor density and power efficiency advantage that shows up in the per-core performance data.

The Intel chip's L1 cache is 64 KB per core, and L2 is 256 KB per core, for a total of 256 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 across four cores. The AMD chip lists 288 KB L1 and 6 MB L2 as total figures, which reflects its six-core design. For shared L3 cache, the Intel part has 6 MB, while the AMD part has 8 MB. Despite having more L3 cache, the AMD chip still loses all multi-core benchmarks, suggesting that cache capacity is not the limiting factor in these tests.

The Intel chip's integrated graphics (Intel HD 2500) is a feature the AMD Opteron lacks entirely. This makes the Intel part a more complete package for desktop systems that do not require a discrete graphics card. The AMD chip, as a server/workstation part, omits integrated graphics entirely.

The process node difference is notable: 22 nm for Intel versus 32 nm for AMD. The die size difference is even more pronounced: 133 mm² for Intel versus 315 mm² for AMD. The AMD chip packs more than twice the silicon area, yet delivers lower performance in every recorded benchmark. This points to the Ivy Bridge architecture's superior instruction efficiency and clock-for-clock performance over Piledriver.

The generation and codename fields also differ: the Intel chip is from the Core i5 (Ivy Bridge) generation, while the AMD chip is from the Opteron (Seoul) generation. The AMD part belongs to the Opteron 4000 series, while the Intel part has no series designation recorded.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded benchmark data, the Intel Core i5-3570S wins in every category measured. The five head-to-head tests cover Cinebench R15 multi-core, R20 multi-core, R20 single-core, R23 multi-core, and R23 single-core. The Intel chip wins all five with margins between 20% and 20.4%.

The Intel processor's wins are particularly strong in single-core workloads, where its boost clock of 3.80 GHz and Ivy Bridge architecture deliver a 20.4% lead in Cinebench R20 single-core. This makes the Intel chip the clear choice for lightly threaded applications that depend on single-core speed. The 20% lead in multi-core tests also means the Intel chip is preferable for multi-threaded rendering workloads, even though the AMD chip has more cores.

The AMD Opteron 4332 HE has no recorded benchmark wins. Its six cores and six threads give it a theoretical advantage in heavily parallel workloads, but the data does not support that advantage in practice. The AMD chip's higher core count does not translate into a single benchmark victory in the database.

For desktop use cases, the Intel Core i5-3570S offers integrated graphics, which the AMD chip lacks. This makes the Intel part suitable for systems without a discrete GPU. The Intel chip also has a higher boost clock and a smaller process node, which contribute to its performance edge.

For server or workstation deployments, the AMD Opteron 4332 HE's classification as a Server/Workstation part suggests it was designed for that market, but the benchmark data shows it trailing the desktop Intel part in every measured workload. The AMD chip's larger L2 and L3 caches do not compensate for its lower per-core performance.

In summary, the Intel Core i5-3570S is the winner across all recorded benchmarks, with no use case in the data where the AMD Opteron 4332 HE comes out ahead. The choice between them, based on the database, is clear: the Intel processor is faster in every measured scenario.