AMD Opteron 3380 vs Intel Core i5-4570TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data presents an unusually one-sided picture. The AMD Opteron 3380 wins all five recorded head-to-head comparisons, with no wins recorded for the Intel Core i5-4570TE. The database shows a clear pattern: the Opteron 3380 takes every Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 test, both single-core and multi-core.

The Opteron 3380's dominance is consistent across every workload category. In multi-core tests, the gap is substantial, reflecting its 8-core, 8-thread configuration versus the Core i5-4570TE's 2-core, 4-thread setup. The multi-core deltas hover around 38%, which is a significant margin for rendering and heavily threaded tasks.

Single-core performance tells a similar story, though the underlying reasons differ. The Opteron 3380's boost clock of 3.60 GHz exceeds the Core i5-4570TE's 3.30 GHz boost, and the recorded single-core scores show the AMD part ahead by roughly 38% as well. This is noteworthy because newer architectures typically win on single-thread efficiency, but here the older K10 design with a higher clock speed prevails.

The Intel Core i5-4570TE has no benchmark wins in the database. Its only recorded advantages appear in specification-level features like integrated graphics (Intel HD 4600) and PCIe Gen 3 support, which do not translate into any measured performance victory in the Cinebench suite. The data suggests that for pure compute workloads, the Opteron 3380 is the stronger choice across the board.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more physical cores?

A: The AMD Opteron 3380 has 8 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-4570TE has 2 cores and 4 threads. This 4x core advantage explains much of the multi-core performance gap.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?

A: The Opteron 3380 has an average benchmark score of 1071, while the Core i5-4570TE averages 1062. This places them within 0.8% of each other on average, despite the Opteron winning every head-to-head Cinebench test.

Q: How do they compare in single-core Cinebench R23 performance?

A: The Opteron 3380 scores 522 in Cinebench R23 single-core, versus 378 for the Core i5-4570TE. That is a 38.1% advantage for the AMD processor in this specific test.

Q: Does the Intel processor have integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Core i5-4570TE includes Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics. The Opteron 3380 does not have integrated graphics, though it can rely on a chipset feature on certain motherboards.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each CPU?

A: The Opteron 3380 has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Core i5-4570TE draws only 35 watts. The Intel part uses less than half the power budget of the AMD chip.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 3?

A: The Intel Core i5-4570TE supports PCIe Gen 3, while the Opteron 3380 is limited to PCIe Gen 2. This could matter for expansion card bandwidth, though it does not affect the recorded Cinebench results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The largest single victory for the AMD Opteron 3380 comes in Cinebench R20 single-core, where it scores 219 against the Core i5-4570TE's 158, a delta of 38.6%. This is the biggest percentage gap in the entire comparison, slightly exceeding the multi-core deltas.

The multi-core tests all show nearly identical margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the Opteron 3380 scores 373 versus 270, a 38.1% lead. Cinebench R20 multi-core repeats the same 38.1% delta, with scores of 1555 and 1126 respectively. Cinebench R23 multi-core follows the pattern at 38.2%, with the AMD part scoring 3704 and the Intel part scoring 2681.

Single-core results are equally decisive. Beyond the R20 single-core result, Cinebench R23 single-core shows the Opteron 3380 at 522 versus 378, a 38.1% advantage. Cinebench R15 single-core was not recorded in the head-to-head set, but the other two single-core tests both favor AMD by similar margins.

The consistency of these deltas is striking. Whether the workload is single-threaded or multi-threaded, the Opteron 3380 maintains roughly a 38% lead. This suggests the performance difference is not workload-dependent but rather a fundamental throughput advantage, likely tied to the combination of higher clock speeds and more cores. The Core i5-4570TE's newer Haswell architecture does not compensate for its lower core count and slightly lower boost clock in these tests.

The database records zero wins for the Intel part across all five head-to-head benchmarks. This is a rare clean sweep, and it implies that users prioritizing Cinebench-style rendering workloads should strongly favor the AMD option.

Specification Differences

The core count difference is the most obvious specification gap. The Opteron 3380 features 8 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5-4570TE has 2 cores and 4 threads. This directly explains the multi-core benchmark results.

Clock speeds differ in both directions. The Opteron 3380 has a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 3.60 GHz. The Core i5-4570TE has a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz but a lower boost clock of 3.30 GHz. The AMD part's higher boost clock contributes to its single-core wins.

Power consumption is a major differentiator. The Opteron 3380 is rated at 65 watts TDP, while the Core i5-4570TE draws only 35 watts. The Intel processor achieves its performance with less than half the power envelope, which matters for system cooling and electricity costs.

Cache configurations are entirely different. The Opteron 3380 has 384 KB of L1 cache, 8 MB of L2 cache, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core i5-4570TE has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part offers substantially more total cache.

Platform support diverges clearly. The Opteron 3380 uses AMD Socket AM3+, while the Core i5-4570TE uses Intel Socket 1150. The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 2, whereas the Intel part supports PCIe Gen 3. Both support dual-channel DDR3 memory, but the Opteron 3380 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 29.9 GB/s while the Intel part's bandwidth is not listed.

The integrated graphics situation is one-sided. The Core i5-4570TE includes Intel HD 4600, while the Opteron 3380 has no integrated graphics of its own, only a chipset feature on certain motherboards. Neither processor supports ECC memory, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural eras. The Opteron 3380 uses AMD's K10 architecture, codenamed Delhi, part of the Opteron 3000 series. The Core i5-4570TE uses Intel's Haswell architecture, which is a significantly newer design.

Manufacturing processes differ notably. The Opteron 3380 is built on a 32 nm process node with 1,200 million transistors on a 315 mm² die. The Core i5-4570TE uses Intel's 22 nm process with 1,400 million transistors on a 177 mm² die. The Intel chip packs more transistors into a much smaller area, indicating a denser, more modern manufacturing process.

The transistor and die size data tells an interesting story. Despite having fewer cores, the Core i5-4570TE has more total transistors (1,400 million versus 1,200 million). This suggests the Haswell architecture incorporates more complex logic per core, including integrated graphics and advanced power management. The Opteron 3380's larger die (315 mm² versus 177 mm²) reflects its older, less dense process technology.

The market positioning differs as well. The Opteron 3380 is classified as a Server/Workstation processor, while the Core i5-4570TE is a Desktop part. The Opteron 3380 is end-of-life, whereas the production status of the Core i5-4570TE is not recorded in the database.

Release dates place them roughly six months apart, with the Opteron 3380 launching in December 2012 and the Core i5-4570TE in June 2013. The newer Intel part does not translate into better Cinebench performance in this comparison, which is a notable finding.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion for compute-heavy workloads: the AMD Opteron 3380 is the superior performer in every recorded benchmark. Its 38% advantage across both single-core and multi-core Cinebench tests makes it the obvious choice for rendering, video encoding, and other CPU-bound tasks.

The Opteron 3380's 8 cores and 8 threads provide a fundamental throughput advantage that the Core i5-4570TE's 2 cores and 4 threads cannot overcome. Even in single-core tests, where the newer Haswell architecture might be expected to excel, the AMD part's higher boost clock of 3.60 GHz proves decisive.

The Core i5-4570TE does have legitimate advantages, but they are not reflected in the benchmark scores. Its 35 watt TDP is nearly half the Opteron 3380's 65 watts, making it far more power-efficient. It includes Intel HD 4600 integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in basic systems. It also supports PCIe Gen 3 and uses a newer 22 nm process.

Users who prioritize raw compute performance and have no concerns about power draw should choose the Opteron 3380. Users who need integrated graphics, lower power consumption, or PCIe Gen 3 support, and who can accept significantly lower Cinebench scores, might prefer the Core i5-4570TE. The benchmark record, however, is unambiguous: 5 wins for AMD, 0 for Intel.