CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 384 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6747P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 288 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 330W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
13,775
8,712
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,944
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
57,397
36,301
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,103
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
136,661
86,432
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,293
N/A
passmark_data_compression
5,679,990
1,833,378
passmark_data_encryption
348,449
90,789
passmark_extended_instructions
383,298
142,557
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,208
1,151
passmark_floating_point_math
1,153,453
365,904
passmark_integer_math
1,926,069
468,518
passmark_multithread
160,542
101,685
passmark_physics
18,707
13,398
passmark_random_string_sorting
633,030
180,382
passmark_single_thread
3,176
3,236
passmark_singlethread
3,176
3,236

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Xeon 6747P

The comparison between the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel's 6747P shows notably comparable results. Both processors deliver equivalent scores over most scenarios, rendering this decision mostly contingent on specific needs. This performance data validates this observation. None of the CPU has a overwhelming advantage. Those could choose based on secondary factors.

As opposed to fixating on small score deltas, future consumers might consider alternative variables. Power efficiency, cooling, total build cost, and feature sets frequently count bigger than small performance advantages. These considerations can tip the choice. Think broadly. This broader perspective counts.

Considering a engineering viewpoint, the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel's 6747P have matching specs. Thread arrangements, frequency clocks, and cache hierarchy configurations are virtually aligned. The technical equivalence supports the comparable performance results. None of the has a notable specification superiority. The comparison is level.

The bottom line: the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel's 6747P are closely comparable. Neither warrants a undisputed preference over the alternative. Make availability and chipset considerations influence your ultimate decision. The two processors can satisfy you well. It's a solid choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9965
6747P
Core Specs
Cores
192
48 -75.0%
Threads
384
96 -75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.7 +20.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.9 +5.4%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.7 +20.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.9 +5.4%
Multiplier
22.5
27 +20.0%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
384 MB (shared)
288 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
330 -34.0%
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Die Size
2x 598 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$14813
$6497
Part Number
100-000000976
SRVEZ
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
94°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9965 Details View Xeon 6747P Details