CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 384 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6730P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 3.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 288 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 250W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
13,775
6,349
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,944
896
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
57,397
26,458
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,103
3,735
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
136,661
62,996
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,293
8,893
passmark_data_compression
5,679,990
1,138,470
passmark_data_encryption
348,449
55,964
passmark_extended_instructions
383,298
96,204
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,208
686
passmark_floating_point_math
1,153,453
226,838
passmark_integer_math
1,926,069
290,740
passmark_multithread
160,542
74,113
passmark_physics
18,707
8,606
passmark_random_string_sorting
633,030
113,919
passmark_single_thread
3,176
2,995
passmark_singlethread
3,176
2,995

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Xeon 6730P

If processing power is so similar, this matchup between AMD AMD EPYC 9965 CPU and Intel Xeon 6730P grows more multifaceted. Each options swap wins in different benchmarks. This aggregate assessment is one of surprising parity. None of the stands as a undisputed winner. This determination hinges on individual needs.

As opposed to dwelling on marginal performance gaps, interested users might weigh additional variables. thermal performance, noise levels, ecosystem expenses, and functionality often are important bigger than small processing gains. These considerations might sway the choice. Think broadly. This larger picture matters.

Rather than focusing on slight score differences, potential users could examine additional elements. thermal performance, cooling, total build cost, and feature sets often play a role bigger than small benchmark improvements. Such considerations can sway the choice. Evaluate holistically. The larger context counts.

When those torn between AMD AMD EPYC 9965 CPU and Intel Xeon 6730P, remain confident that both option provides matching performance. The test figures supports nil clear leader. Form your choice on secondary factors and experience capable capability regardless. Either are excellent in their given way. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9965
6730P
Core Specs
Cores
192
32 -83.3%
Threads
384
64 -83.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.5 +11.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.8 +2.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.5 +11.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.8 +2.7%
Multiplier
22.5
25 +11.1%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
384 MB (shared)
288 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
250 -50.0%
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Die Size
2x 598 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$14813
$3726
Part Number
100-000000976
SRV5R
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
94°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9965 Details View Xeon 6730P Details