CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 384 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6520P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 144 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 210W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
13,775
5,392
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,944
761
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
57,397
22,467
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,103
3,171
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
136,661
53,495
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,293
7,552
passmark_data_compression
5,679,990
841,518
passmark_data_encryption
348,449
45,188
passmark_extended_instructions
383,298
64,557
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,208
526
passmark_floating_point_math
1,153,453
162,862
passmark_integer_math
1,926,069
214,288
passmark_multithread
160,542
62,936
passmark_physics
18,707
7,209
passmark_random_string_sorting
633,030
95,736
passmark_single_thread
3,176
3,356
passmark_singlethread
3,176
3,356

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Xeon 6520P

the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel 6520P CPU provide almost equivalent benchmark scores in every analysis. The gaps between these two sit inside margin of error, suggesting any can satisfy consumers comparably adequately. The equivalence makes the choice nuanced. Secondary elements turn more relevant. Value often influences the balance.

Rather than fixating on minor score differences, potential users might weigh secondary factors. TDP, cooling, ecosystem expenses, and capabilities usually play a role greater than small benchmark gains. Such elements should tip the scales. Consider completely. The complete picture matters.

Based on a hardware viewpoint, the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel 6520P CPU have comparable specifications. Processing counts, frequency clocks, and memory subsystem capacities are closely equivalent. The technical equivalence explains the comparable benchmark data. Neither has a considerable hardware lead. The comparison is fair.

For people conflicted between the AMD EPYC 9965 chip from AMD and Intel 6520P CPU, remain comfortable that any selection offers similar results. The test numbers confirms zero obvious victor. Make your decision on secondary elements and enjoy capable results regardless. The two are capable in their particular regard. Go with assuredly.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9965
6520P
Core Specs
Cores
192
24 -87.5%
Threads
384
48 -87.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.4 +6.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
4 +8.1%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.4 +6.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
4 +8.1%
Multiplier
22.5
24 +6.7%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
384 MB (shared)
144 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
210 -58.0%
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Die Size
598 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$14813
$1295
Part Number
100-000000976
SRVNQ
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
95°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9965 Details View Xeon 6520P Details