CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 384 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6515P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 3.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 72 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 150W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
13,775
3,885
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,944
548
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
57,397
16,189
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,103
2,285
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
136,661
38,547
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,293
5,442
passmark_data_compression
5,679,990
592,645
passmark_data_encryption
348,449
30,476
passmark_extended_instructions
383,298
53,383
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,208
385
passmark_floating_point_math
1,153,453
128,954
passmark_integer_math
1,926,069
147,047
passmark_multithread
160,542
45,350
passmark_physics
18,707
3,829
passmark_random_string_sorting
633,030
64,425
passmark_single_thread
3,176
2,855
passmark_singlethread
3,176
2,855

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Xeon 6515P

AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD and Xeon 6515P deliver almost equal performance in our comparison. The gaps between both chips sit within testing variance, indicating each would fulfill buyers similarly effectively. The equivalence makes the decision multifaceted. Additional considerations become increasingly important. Price typically affects the choice.

Considering a engineering angle, AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD and Xeon 6515P possess equivalent specs. Execution arrangements, boost speeds, and L3 sizes are nearly equivalent. The specification balance accounts for the matched test results. Not one maintains a significant engineering lead. The comparison is level.

No processor possesses a decisive advantage in this matchup. AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD edges slightly in particular workloads, while Xeon 6515P takes different ones. This back-and-forth trend indicates fundamental equality between them. The differences are small and possibly invisible in actual usage. The two deliver capable results.

To summarize, this comparison between AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD and Xeon 6515P concludes in a effective deadlock. Performance deltas are small and unlikely to change everyday experience. Focus your determination on availability, ecosystem preferences, and specific capability preferences. Each are strong selections. The parity is true.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9965
6515P
Core Specs
Cores
192
16 -91.7%
Threads
384
32 -91.7%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.3 +2.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.8 +2.7%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.3 +2.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
3.8 +2.7%
Multiplier
22.5
23 +2.2%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
384 MB (shared)
72 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
150 -70.0%
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
3 nm
5 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$14813
$740
Part Number
100-000000976
SRVU6
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9965 Details View Xeon 6515P Details