CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 500W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 3 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6511P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 72 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 150W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

13,775

3,914

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,944

552

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

57,397

16,309

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

8,103

2,302

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

136,661

38,833

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

19,293

5,482

passmark_data_compression

5,679,990

640,808

passmark_data_encryption

348,449

31,429

passmark_extended_instructions

383,298

50,730

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,208

308

passmark_floating_point_math

1,153,453

127,307

passmark_integer_math

1,926,069

162,524

passmark_multithread

160,542

45,687

passmark_physics

18,707

4,678

passmark_random_string_sorting

633,030

67,809

passmark_single_thread

3,176

2,545

passmark_singlethread

3,176

2,545

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Xeon 6511P

AMD's AMD EPYC 9965 and Intel 6511P deliver almost identical processing power in every analysis. Any gaps between them fall within benchmark noise, implying both will serve buyers similarly adequately. This balance renders the decision complex. Additional elements get more significant. Price frequently affects the decision.

None of the CPU holds a decisive advantage in this comparison. AMD's AMD EPYC 9965 leads slightly in certain workloads, while Intel 6511P takes other benchmarks. This trading trend indicates core equivalence between these two. The deltas are small and possibly invisible in practical applications. Either achieve strong throughput.

Gaming benchmarks additionally indicate close numbers between AMD's AMD EPYC 9965 and Intel 6511P. Frame rates gaps generally land below testing variance. This marginal deltas are seldom detectable during practical play sessions. Either processors provide capable results. Gaming enthusiasts should choose comfortably between these two.

When those torn between AMD's AMD EPYC 9965 and Intel 6511P, remain assured that each option achieves comparable results. The benchmark figures supports zero clear victor. Base your determination on alternative elements and experience capable results either way. Each are champions in this particular right. Choose confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9965

6511P

Core Specs

Cores

192

16 -91.7%

Threads

384

32 -91.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.25

2.3 +2.2%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.2 +13.5%

Frequency (GHz)

2.25

2.3 +2.2%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.2 +13.5%

Multiplier

22.5

23 +2.2%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

72 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

500

150 -70.0%

Configurable TDP

450-500 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

3 nm

5 nm

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 136 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$14813

$815

Part Number

100-000000976

SRVU9

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

98°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9965 Details View Xeon 6511P Details