CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9965

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 192 Cores / 384 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 384 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
13,775
1,506
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,944
212
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
57,397
6,278
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
8,103
886
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
136,661
14,948
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
19,293
2,110
passmark_data_compression
5,679,990
202,225
passmark_data_encryption
348,449
11,964
passmark_extended_instructions
383,298
12,463
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,208
48
passmark_floating_point_math
1,153,453
42,108
passmark_integer_math
1,926,069
56,308
passmark_multithread
160,542
17,586
passmark_physics
18,707
928
passmark_random_string_sorting
633,030
23,223
passmark_single_thread
3,176
3,735
passmark_singlethread
3,176
3,735

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9965 vs Intel Core 3 100HL

Speed hunters evaluating AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD against Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor can see quickly that AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD claims the advantage. The silicon leads in demanding scenarios, positioning it excellent for demanding users. The technical upgrades over Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor lead into noticeable everyday improvements. From content creation, AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD dependably surpasses its rival. This delta is considerable sufficiently to affect practical experience.

Looking at a specification angle, AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD offers better memory subsystem, increased boost clocks, and more optimized thermal management. Such aspects merge to deliver reliably superior benchmarks throughout multiple scenarios. The technical advances establish AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD a compelling pick. Whether you're compiling, this CPU processes it capably. Enthusiasts should particularly benefit from these improvements.

Ultimately: AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD claims this comparison convincingly. Consumers valuing performance would strongly consider AMD EPYC 9965 by AMD over Intel Intel Core 3 100HL processor. This benchmark data supports this conclusion. The workloads might gain from its higher power. It's a obvious victor in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9965
3 100HL
Core Specs
Cores
192
8 -95.8%
Threads
384
12 -96.9%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.1 -6.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
4.6 +24.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.1 -6.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
4.6 +24.3%
Multiplier
22.5
21 -6.7%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
384 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
500
45 -91.0%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
450-500 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-PS
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Process Size
3 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 1700
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$14813
Part Number
100-000000976
unknown
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9965 Details View Core 3 100HL Details