CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9754

CORE STATE Bergamo
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 360W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6960P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 72 Cores / 144 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo
CACHE 432 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 500W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
8,460
11,194
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,194
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
35,254
46,645
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,977
N/A
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
83,939
111,060
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
11,850
N/A
passmark_data_compression
3,558,043
2,797,724
passmark_data_encryption
231,891
162,013
passmark_extended_instructions
224,322
193,404
passmark_find_prime_numbers
604
1,484
passmark_floating_point_math
588,187
527,473
passmark_integer_math
1,026,896
727,750
passmark_multithread
98,752
130,659
passmark_physics
8,793
24,937
passmark_random_string_sorting
306,481
371,795
passmark_single_thread
2,328
3,287
passmark_singlethread
2,328
3,287

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Xeon 6960P

AMD AMD EPYC 9754 CPU and Xeon 6960P deliver almost identical processing power in this test. The differences between the processors sit under margin of error, meaning any will serve builders equally adequately. This equality positions the decision complex. Alternative elements turn more important. Value typically influences the balance.

Neither processor maintains a overwhelming lead in this comparison. AMD AMD EPYC 9754 CPU leads marginally in some workloads, while Xeon 6960P takes other benchmarks. The trading trend demonstrates underlying equality between these two. The variations are marginal and potentially unnoticeable in real-world tasks. Each achieve solid throughput.

Gaming benchmarks also indicate close results between AMD AMD EPYC 9754 CPU and Xeon 6960P. Frame rates gaps generally land below margin of error. Such slight differences are seldom detectable during practical gameplay. Each chips deliver capable performance. Gaming enthusiasts could decide assuredly between the options.

In the end, consumers should pick based on availability instead of pure speed alone. Either AMD AMD EPYC 9754 CPU and Xeon 6960P achieve strong performance for their respective tiers. This choice rests on personal preferences. Either pick is valid. Users can't go badly with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9754
6960P
Core Specs
Cores
128
72 -43.8%
Threads
256
144 -43.8%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.7 +20.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.1
3.9 +25.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.7 +20.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.1
3.9 +25.8%
Multiplier
22.5
27 +20.0%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
432 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
360
500 +38.9%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Granite Rapids
Codename
Bergamo
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-AP)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
71,000 million
Die Size
8x 73 mm²
3x 598 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s
614.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 7529
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
6 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$11900
$9625
Part Number
100-000001234
SRPKX
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
102°C
Bundled Cooler
None
None
View EPYC 9754 Details View Xeon 6960P Details