CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9754

CORE STATE Bergamo

CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6747P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 48 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 288 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 330W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,460

8,712

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,194

N/A

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

35,254

36,301

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

4,977

N/A

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

83,939

86,432

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

11,850

N/A

passmark_data_compression

3,558,043

1,833,378

passmark_data_encryption

231,891

90,789

passmark_extended_instructions

224,322

142,557

passmark_find_prime_numbers

604

1,151

passmark_floating_point_math

588,187

365,904

passmark_integer_math

1,026,896

468,518

passmark_multithread

98,752

101,685

passmark_physics

8,793

13,398

passmark_random_string_sorting

306,481

180,382

passmark_single_thread

2,328

3,236

passmark_singlethread

2,328

3,236

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Xeon 6747P

The comparison between AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and 6747P from Intel shows notably close performance. Each processors provide similar results over the majority of benchmarks, making this choice primarily dependent on cost. The performance results confirms this conclusion. Neither chip maintains a decisive edge. Those might choose based on additional variables.

Over fixating on slight benchmark variations, future buyers should weigh additional variables. Power efficiency, acoustics, motherboard prices, and extras often matter bigger than slight processing advantages. These factors might influence the choice. Weigh completely. This bigger context matters.

Game performance performance additionally indicate matched numbers between AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and 6747P from Intel. Frame rates gaps often fall within 5-10%. Such small differences are barely perceptible during real gameplay. Both options deliver responsive performance. Players can decide comfortably between these two.

Overall, the matchup between AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and 6747P from Intel finishes in a near stalemate. Processing deltas are minor and unlikely to affect actual applications. Center your decision on availability, platform preferences, and individual functionality needs. Both are solid options. The balance is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9754

6747P

Core Specs

Cores

128

48 -62.5%

Threads

256

96 -62.5%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.25

2.7 +20.0%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.1

3.9 +25.8%

Frequency (GHz)

2.25

2.7 +20.0%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.1

3.9 +25.8%

Multiplier

22.5

27 +20.0%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

288 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

330 -8.3%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Bergamo

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

71,000 million

—

Die Size

8x 73 mm²

2x 598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11900

$6497

Part Number

100-000001234

SRVEZ

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

94°C

Bundled Cooler

None

View EPYC 9754 Details View Xeon 6747P Details