CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9754

CORE STATE Bergamo
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 360W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest
CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 96 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 205W
ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
8,460
5,292
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,194
747
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
35,254
22,053
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
4,977
3,113
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
83,939
52,508
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
11,850
7,413
passmark_data_compression
3,558,043
1,230,786
passmark_data_encryption
231,891
81,850
passmark_extended_instructions
224,322
59,625
passmark_find_prime_numbers
604
451
passmark_floating_point_math
588,187
219,926
passmark_integer_math
1,026,896
302,954
passmark_multithread
98,752
61,775
passmark_physics
8,793
5,000
passmark_random_string_sorting
306,481
151,491
passmark_single_thread
2,328
1,910
passmark_singlethread
2,328
1,910

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Xeon 6710E

The comparison between the AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and Intel 6710E demonstrates remarkably matched performance. Both options provide similar performance over the majority of benchmarks, making this pick primarily dependent on specific needs. This performance figures demonstrates this assessment. None of the CPU holds a decisive lead. Those could decide based on secondary considerations.

Gaming benchmarks similarly indicate competitive scores between the AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and Intel 6710E. Performance differences often remain within testing variance. The marginal differences are seldom visible during practical gaming sessions. Each options provide responsive experiences. Players could decide comfortably between these two.

Rather than dwelling on small score deltas, interested consumers might consider alternative elements. Power efficiency, acoustics, motherboard prices, and extras frequently count larger than marginal performance differences. Such variables can affect the decision. Think holistically. This complete perspective matters.

When buyers undecided between the AMD AMD EPYC 9754 and Intel 6710E, be confident that each choice offers matching capability. This score data validates zero obvious champion. Make your decision on alternative factors and benefit from capable throughput no matter what. Either are winners in this given way. Choose comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9754
6710E
Core Specs
Cores
128
64 -50.0%
Threads
256
64 -75.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.25
2.4 +6.7%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.1
3.2 +3.2%
Frequency (GHz)
2.25
2.4 +6.7%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.1
3.2 +3.2%
Multiplier
22.5
24 +6.7%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
4 MB (per module)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
96 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
360
205 -43.1%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Sierra Forest
Codename
Bergamo
Sierra Forest
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))
Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)
Process Size
5 nm
5 nm
Transistors
71,000 million
Die Size
8x 73 mm²
578 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s
358.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
4 x24 16 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$11900
$2749
Part Number
100-000001234
SRPG2
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
106°C
Bundled Cooler
None
None
View EPYC 9754 Details View Xeon 6710E Details