CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9754

CORE STATE Bergamo

CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo

CACHE 12 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

8,460

1,506

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,194

212

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

35,254

6,278

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

4,977

886

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

83,939

14,948

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

11,850

2,110

passmark_data_compression

3,558,043

202,225

passmark_data_encryption

231,891

11,964

passmark_extended_instructions

224,322

12,463

passmark_find_prime_numbers

604

passmark_floating_point_math

588,187

42,108

passmark_integer_math

1,026,896

56,308

passmark_multithread

98,752

17,586

passmark_physics

8,793

928

passmark_random_string_sorting

306,481

23,223

passmark_single_thread

2,328

3,735

passmark_singlethread

2,328

3,735

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9754 vs Intel Core 3 100HL

When comparing the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD vs Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL chip, the benchmark delta becomes quickly visible. Sporting superior parallel throughput, the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD delivers substantially quicker performance in demanding applications. This core count benefit translates clearly into actual advantages. Performance figures validates this assessment. Buyers wanting pure power might appreciate what the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD offers to the matchup.

The performance gap between the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD and Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL chip becomes especially obvious in concurrent tasks. Workloads like code compilation demonstrate the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD's strengths. Its greater processing resources deliver significant throughput for resource-hungry scenarios. This capability results into reduced render times. Efficiency benefits are real and considerable.

At the end of the day: the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD secures this matchup obviously. Users wanting capability should certainly choose the AMD EPYC 9754 chip from AMD over Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL chip. The performance results confirms this verdict. The applications will improve from its better capabilities. It's a clear winner in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9754

3 100HL

Core Specs

Cores

128

8 -93.8%

Threads

256

12 -95.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.25

2.1 -6.7%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.1

4.6 +48.4%

Frequency (GHz)

2.25

2.1 -6.7%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.1

4.6 +48.4%

Multiplier

22.5

21 -6.7%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

12 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

45 -87.5%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Raptor Lake

Codename

Bergamo

Raptor Lake-PS

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))

Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

71,000 million

—

Die Size

8x 73 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11900

—

Part Number

100-000001234

unknown

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

—

View EPYC 9754 Details View Core 3 100HL Details