CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9745

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 128 Cores / 256 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 400W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 3 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo
CACHE 12 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
11,198
1,506
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,580
212
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
46,659
6,278
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
6,586
886
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
111,093
14,948
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
15,683
2,110
passmark_data_compression
3,929,890
202,225
passmark_data_encryption
229,447
11,964
passmark_extended_instructions
280,477
12,463
passmark_find_prime_numbers
979
48
passmark_floating_point_math
761,219
42,108
passmark_integer_math
1,224,315
56,308
passmark_multithread
130,698
17,586
passmark_physics
17,122
928
passmark_random_string_sorting
468,975
23,223
passmark_single_thread
2,806
3,735
passmark_singlethread
2,806
3,735

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9745 vs Intel Core 3 100HL

If you're comparing AMD AMD EPYC 9745 compared to Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL, the score disparity becomes obviously noticeable. With superior concurrent throughput, AMD AMD EPYC 9745 offers significantly more rapid execution in heavy scenarios. This CPU architecture benefit converts clearly into real-world advantages. Test figures demonstrates this observation. People seeking maximum power should enjoy what AMD AMD EPYC 9745 provides to the matchup.

Game performance performance also benefit AMD AMD EPYC 9745 in this matchup. Increased smoothness and more stable frame pacing emerge from the superior single-threaded speed. Gamers might feel enhanced performance, specifically in processor-intensive situations. The benefit holds in various scenarios. Esports titles notably gains from this throughput edge.

Game performance performance similarly benefit AMD AMD EPYC 9745 in this comparison. Higher frame rates and better steady frame pacing come from its stronger IPC speed. Gaming enthusiasts will observe enhanced performance, notably in processor-intensive situations. The advantage holds in various settings. Competitive scenarios particularly benefits from this throughput edge.

At the end of the day: AMD AMD EPYC 9745 claims this comparison clearly. Those valuing power might strongly choose AMD AMD EPYC 9745 over Intel's Intel Core 3 100HL. This test data validates this recommendation. The workloads might benefit from the stronger throughput. This is a obvious winner in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9745
3 100HL
Core Specs
Cores
128
8 -93.8%
Threads
256
12 -95.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.1 -12.5%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.7
4.6 +24.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.1 -12.5%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.7
4.6 +24.3%
Multiplier
24
21 -12.5%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
12 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
400
45 -88.8%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-PS
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5c (Turin))
Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)
Process Size
3 nm
10 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 1700
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 48EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$12141
Part Number
100-000001460
unknown
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9745 Details View Core 3 100HL Details