CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9734

CORE STATE Bergamo
CORE SPECS 112 Cores / 224 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 340W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
8,763
2,053
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,237
289
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
36,516
8,558
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
5,155
1,208
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
86,943
20,378
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
12,274
2,877
passmark_data_compression
2,900,008
271,774
passmark_data_encryption
179,390
15,155
passmark_extended_instructions
205,925
16,897
passmark_find_prime_numbers
829
102
passmark_floating_point_math
549,045
58,905
passmark_integer_math
823,150
80,396
passmark_multithread
102,286
23,975
passmark_physics
6,747
1,723
passmark_random_string_sorting
357,638
28,866
passmark_single_thread
2,310
3,782
passmark_singlethread
2,310
3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9734 vs Intel Core 7 240H

Speed hunters evaluating AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD with Intel Intel Core 7 240H processor should find at once that AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD holds the lead. The processor dominates in intensive scenarios, making it perfect for demanding users. The technical upgrades over Intel Intel Core 7 240H processor result into measurable everyday advantages. Whether it's productivity, AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD dependably outperforms its rival. The delta is considerable sufficiently to matter real usage.

Looking at a technical angle, AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD includes better cache, increased frequencies, and greater refined thermal management. Such aspects work together to offer steadily higher performance over various use cases. The design advances make AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD a strong selection. If you're rendering, the processor handles it capably. Power users can specifically enjoy these improvements.

All things considered, AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD offers the more capable pick in this comparison. The performance superiority validate consideration for those putting together a high-performance rig. Though Intel Intel Core 7 240H processor features its advantages, the performance numbers obviously advantages AMD EPYC 9734 by AMD. Make your decision with this in mind. The processing difference is significant enough to influence.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9734
7 240H
Core Specs
Cores
112
10 -91.1%
Threads
224
16 -92.9%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.2
2.5 +13.6%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
5.2 +73.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.2
2.5 +13.6%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
5.2 +73.3%
Multiplier
22
25 +13.6%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
340
45 -86.8%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Raptor Lake
Codename
Bergamo
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Bergamo))
Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
71,000 million
Die Size
8x 73 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 64EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$9600
$502
Part Number
100-000001235
SRQ6TQ5ML
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9734 Details View Core 7 240H Details