CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9655

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 96 Cores / 192 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

13,373

2,053

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,887

289

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

55,722

8,558

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

7,866

1,208

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

132,672

20,378

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

18,730

2,877

passmark_data_compression

3,271,896

271,774

passmark_data_encryption

210,555

15,155

passmark_extended_instructions

203,285

16,897

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,598

102

passmark_floating_point_math

662,958

58,905

passmark_integer_math

1,139,161

80,396

passmark_multithread

156,110

23,975

passmark_physics

25,947

1,723

passmark_random_string_sorting

439,682

28,866

passmark_single_thread

3,847

3,782

passmark_singlethread

3,847

3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9655 vs Intel Core 7 240H

For this direct analysis, AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 stands as the undisputed victor. The performance results demonstrate considerable margins in most multi-threaded scenarios. If you're constructing a gaming PC, AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 offers superior power in this segment. This silicon processes complex computations with efficiency. This is especially obvious in actual scenarios.

From a technical angle, AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 offers improved memory subsystem, better clock speeds, and extra refined energy control. These aspects combine to offer steadily stronger results over diverse use cases. This architectural improvements position AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 a solid option. If you're rendering, this silicon manages it efficiently. Demanding users will specifically value these improvements.

The bottom line: AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 secures this battle decisively. Buyers wanting power will seriously choose AMD's AMD EPYC 9655 over the Intel Intel Core 7 240H. The benchmark results confirms this verdict. Your scenarios can profit from its superior power. This is a straightforward choice in this class.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9655

7 240H

Core Specs

Cores

10 -89.6%

Threads

192

16 -91.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.6

2.5 -3.8%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.5

5.2 +15.6%

Frequency (GHz)

2.6

2.5 -3.8%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.5

5.2 +15.6%

Multiplier

25 -3.8%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

45 -88.8%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

99,780 million

—

Die Size

12x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11852

$502

Part Number

100-000000674

SRQ6TQ5ML

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9655 Details View Core 7 240H Details