CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9634

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 84 Cores / 168 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.25 Base / 3.7 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 290W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6745P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 336 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 300W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

9,248

7,214

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,305

1,018

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

38,535

30,062

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,440

4,244

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

91,752

71,578

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

12,953

N/A

passmark_data_compression

2,236,412

1,352,801

passmark_data_encryption

151,943

66,665

passmark_extended_instructions

137,543

108,326

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,176

681

passmark_floating_point_math

353,784

267,438

passmark_integer_math

725,356

336,926

passmark_multithread

107,944

84,210

passmark_physics

12,291

6,144

passmark_random_string_sorting

261,134

133,528

passmark_single_thread

2,924

3,450

passmark_singlethread

2,924

3,450

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9634 vs Intel Xeon 6745P

The comparison between AMD EPYC 9634 from AMD and 6745P demonstrates notably similar results. Both options offer similar scores in the majority of workloads, leaving the choice largely based on price. This score data confirms this conclusion. Not one chip has a clear advantage. Those could pick based on additional elements.

Gaming performance likewise demonstrate close performance between AMD EPYC 9634 from AMD and 6745P. Performance gaps generally sit inside margin of error. These marginal differences are rarely perceptible during practical play sessions. Either options provide responsive performance. Those who game could decide assuredly between the options.

In-game results additionally show close performance between AMD EPYC 9634 from AMD and 6745P. Frame rates differences often remain under testing variance. This minor deltas are seldom perceptible during real play sessions. Either chips achieve responsive performance. Gaming enthusiasts could select safely between both chips.

In the end, buyers could select based on platform preference rather than benchmark speed exclusively. Either AMD EPYC 9634 from AMD and 6745P provide solid capability for their respective categories. The choice comes down to specific preferences. Any choice is reasonable. Users can't go astray with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9634

6745P

Core Specs

Cores

32 -61.9%

Threads

168

64 -61.9%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.25

3.1 +37.8%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.3 +16.2%

Frequency (GHz)

2.25

3.1 +37.8%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.7

4.3 +16.2%

Multiplier

22.5

31 +37.8%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

336 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

290

300 +3.4%

Configurable TDP

240-300 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

78,840 million

—

Die Size

12x 72 mm²

2x 598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$10304

$5250

Part Number

100-100000797

SRWPAQ7L9

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

97°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9634 Details View Xeon 6745P Details