CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9575F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6710E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 205W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

12,876

5,292

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,817

747

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

53,650

22,053

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

7,573

3,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

127,739

52,508

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

18,033

7,413

passmark_data_compression

2,773,634

1,230,786

passmark_data_encryption

162,818

81,850

passmark_extended_instructions

197,484

59,625

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,215

451

passmark_floating_point_math

526,003

219,926

passmark_integer_math

891,817

302,954

passmark_multithread

147,998

61,775

passmark_physics

20,652

5,000

passmark_random_string_sorting

348,500

151,491

passmark_single_thread

4,173

1,910

passmark_singlethread

4,173

1,910

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Xeon 6710E

AMD AMD EPYC 9575F and 6710E from Intel offer almost identical capabilities in every comparison. Any variations between both chips land inside benchmark noise, indicating either will satisfy buyers comparably capably. This equality positions the choice nuanced. Alternative elements get increasingly significant. Value typically tips the balance.

No chip holds a clear superiority here. AMD AMD EPYC 9575F leads barely in specific workloads, while 6710E from Intel secures alternative tests. The alternating trend demonstrates inherent balance between them. The variations are marginal and possibly invisible in actual tasks. Either achieve excellent results.

All things considered, this analysis between AMD AMD EPYC 9575F and 6710E from Intel ends in a practical stalemate. Benchmark gaps are marginal and doubtful to impact actual experience. Center your selection on cost, chipset considerations, and individual functionality requirements. The two are solid options. The balance is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9575F

6710E

Core Specs

Cores

64 0.0%

Threads

128

64 -50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.3

2.4 -27.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.2 -36.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.3

2.4 -27.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.2 -36.0%

Multiplier

24 -27.3%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

205 -48.8%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Sierra Forest

Codename

Turin

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

358.4 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 16 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11791

$2749

Part Number

100-000001554

SRPG2

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9575F Details View Xeon 6710E Details