CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9575F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 400W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6507P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 48 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 150W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
12,876
2,676
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,817
377
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
53,650
11,150
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
7,573
1,573
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
127,739
26,548
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
18,033
3,747
passmark_data_compression
2,773,634
356,190
passmark_data_encryption
162,818
17,753
passmark_extended_instructions
197,484
27,385
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,215
224
passmark_floating_point_math
526,003
69,604
passmark_integer_math
891,817
88,877
passmark_multithread
147,998
31,233
passmark_physics
20,652
2,935
passmark_random_string_sorting
348,500
39,682
passmark_single_thread
4,173
3,643
passmark_singlethread
4,173
3,643

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Xeon 6507P

the AMD AMD EPYC 9575F and Intel 6507P CPU deliver almost equivalent benchmark scores in the analysis. Any differences between these two remain under margin of error, meaning each would fulfill consumers just as well. This equivalence makes the selection nuanced. Secondary considerations turn more critical. Value typically affects the decision.

Instead of obsessing on minor score deltas, future builders can evaluate alternative factors. thermal performance, noise levels, total build cost, and capabilities often matter bigger than small processing improvements. Such considerations could influence the decision. Evaluate holistically. This broader picture matters.

Considering a specification angle, the AMD AMD EPYC 9575F and Intel 6507P CPU possess matching specifications. Thread setups, frequency speeds, and cache sizes are virtually comparable. This spec equality explains the close performance numbers. None of the maintains a substantial engineering edge. The competition is even.

The bottom line: the AMD AMD EPYC 9575F and Intel 6507P CPU are evenly competitive. Neither warrants a undisputed recommendation over the competitor. Have cost and motherboard considerations shape your concluding selection. Both CPUs can serve you effectively. It's a safe scenario.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9575F
6507P
Core Specs
Cores
64
8 -87.5%
Threads
128
16 -87.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
3.5 +6.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
4.3 -14.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
3.5 +6.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
4.3 -14.0%
Multiplier
33
35 +6.1%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
48 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
400
150 -62.5%
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$11791
$765
Part Number
100-000001554
SRVU5
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
103°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9575F Details View Xeon 6507P Details