CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9575F

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 400W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
12,876
2,053
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
1,817
289
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
53,650
8,558
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
7,573
1,208
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
127,739
20,378
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
18,033
2,877
passmark_data_compression
2,773,634
271,774
passmark_data_encryption
162,818
15,155
passmark_extended_instructions
197,484
16,897
passmark_find_prime_numbers
1,215
102
passmark_floating_point_math
526,003
58,905
passmark_integer_math
891,817
80,396
passmark_multithread
147,998
23,975
passmark_physics
20,652
1,723
passmark_random_string_sorting
348,500
28,866
passmark_single_thread
4,173
3,782
passmark_singlethread
4,173
3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Core 7 240H

When comparing the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD against Intel's Intel Core 7 240H chip, the difference becomes clearly visible. Boasting higher concurrent capabilities, the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD delivers considerably quicker execution in resource-hungry scenarios. This core count superiority converts immediately into actual advantages. Performance numbers validates this finding. Buyers wanting raw speed might enjoy what the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD provides to the equation.

Intel's Intel Core 7 240H chip shouldn't be written off entirely, though the processing deficit versus the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD is challenging to overlook. In value-focused consumers, Intel's Intel Core 7 240H chip could nonetheless be a choice when the smaller MSRP accounts for its diminished capabilities. That said, for peak performance, the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD remains the definite winner. The conclusion is obvious. Power hunters might lean toward the AMD EPYC 9575F chip from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9575F
7 240H
Core Specs
Cores
64
10 -84.4%
Threads
128
16 -87.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.3
2.5 -24.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.3
2.5 -24.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5
5.2 +4.0%
Multiplier
33
25 -24.2%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
400
45 -88.8%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 4 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 64EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$11791
$502
Part Number
100-000001554
SRQ6TQ5ML
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9575F Details View Core 7 240H Details