CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9575F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.3 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

12,876

1,840

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,817

259

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

53,650

7,667

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

7,573

1,082

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

127,739

18,255

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

18,033

2,577

passmark_data_compression

2,773,634

219,535

passmark_data_encryption

162,818

11,131

passmark_extended_instructions

197,484

14,264

passmark_find_prime_numbers

1,215

passmark_floating_point_math

526,003

45,383

passmark_integer_math

891,817

60,462

passmark_multithread

147,998

18,597

passmark_physics

20,652

1,333

passmark_random_string_sorting

348,500

21,499

passmark_single_thread

4,173

3,595

passmark_singlethread

4,173

3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9575F vs Intel Core 5 120

AMD's AMD EPYC 9575F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) provide almost equal processing power in every evaluation. The gaps between both chips sit within margin of error, meaning either could satisfy builders equally adequately. This equivalence renders the selection nuanced. Secondary factors get increasingly critical. Cost frequently tips the choice.

Based on a engineering perspective, AMD's AMD EPYC 9575F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) possess similar capabilities. Execution arrangements, clock clocks, and L3 configurations are virtually comparable. This specification balance explains the matched performance results. No possesses a notable technical superiority. This competition is fair.

The bottom line: AMD's AMD EPYC 9575F chip and Intel Core 5 120 (Intel) are closely competitive. None of the deserves a obvious nod over the other. Let cost and motherboard considerations guide your eventual selection. Either processors might fulfill you capably. It's a solid decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9575F

5 120

Core Specs

Cores

6 -90.6%

Threads

128

12 -90.6%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.3

2.5 -24.2%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.5 -10.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.3

2.5 -24.2%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.5 -10.0%

Multiplier

25 -24.2%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

65 -83.8%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

110 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

66,520 million

—

Die Size

8x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 730

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$11791

$211

Part Number

100-000001554

SA35V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

—

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 9575F Details View Core 5 120 Details