CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9565

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 72 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.15 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6731P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 245W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

11,585

4,522

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,635

638

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

48,273

18,845

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

6,814

2,660

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

114,937

44,871

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

16,226

6,334

passmark_data_compression

2,579,631

799,474

passmark_data_encryption

141,936

40,087

passmark_extended_instructions

209,595

65,656

passmark_find_prime_numbers

2,422

541

passmark_floating_point_math

549,422

157,330

passmark_integer_math

717,948

198,761

passmark_multithread

135,221

52,790

passmark_physics

18,036

7,105

passmark_random_string_sorting

291,941

88,019

passmark_single_thread

3,696

2,107

passmark_singlethread

3,696

2,107

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9565 vs Intel Xeon 6731P

The comparison between AMD EPYC 9565 from AMD and Xeon 6731P reveals notably close benchmark scores. The two processors provide similar numbers across many scenarios, rendering the choice mostly contingent on specific needs. The benchmark figures supports this observation. Neither chip possesses a clear advantage. Users could choose based on additional factors.

No chip has a overwhelming edge here. AMD EPYC 9565 from AMD leads narrowly in particular workloads, while Xeon 6731P secures others. This back-and-forth pattern suggests inherent equivalence between these two. The gaps are marginal and possibly negligible in practical tasks. Each provide solid results.

Game performance performance additionally reveal similar numbers between AMD EPYC 9565 from AMD and Xeon 6731P. Smoothness differences often land within testing variance. These small gaps are barely perceptible during real play sessions. Either options provide responsive performance. Gamers might decide comfortably between the options.

In conclusion, the matchup between AMD EPYC 9565 from AMD and Xeon 6731P ends in a near stalemate. Speed differences are minor and unlikely to change actual applications. Center your choice on price, platform options, and specific extra requirements. The two are solid picks. This tie is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9565

6731P

Core Specs

Cores

32 -55.6%

Threads

144

64 -55.6%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.15

2.5 -20.6%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.3

4.1 -4.7%

Frequency (GHz)

3.15

2.5 -20.6%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.3

4.1 -4.7%

Multiplier

31.5

25 -20.6%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

245 -38.8%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

99,780 million

—

Die Size

12x 70.6 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 136 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$10486

$2700

Part Number

100-000001447

SRVNR

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

102°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9565 Details View Xeon 6731P Details