CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9565

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 72 Cores / 144 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.15 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 384 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 400W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6517P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.2 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 72 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 190W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

11,585

4,268

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,635

602

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

48,273

17,787

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

6,814

2,511

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

114,937

42,352

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

16,226

5,979

passmark_data_compression

2,579,631

653,338

passmark_data_encryption

141,936

32,385

passmark_extended_instructions

209,595

51,891

passmark_find_prime_numbers

2,422

335

passmark_floating_point_math

549,422

127,497

passmark_integer_math

717,948

162,671

passmark_multithread

135,221

49,786

passmark_physics

18,036

4,452

passmark_random_string_sorting

291,941

67,480

passmark_single_thread

3,696

3,311

passmark_singlethread

3,696

3,311

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9565 vs Intel Xeon 6517P

During this direct comparison, AMD EPYC 9565 stands as the obvious winner. Its test numbers indicate significant gaps in every single-threaded tests. If you're putting together a workstation rig, AMD EPYC 9565 delivers more power at this tier. This CPU manages heavy operations with ease. It's notably evident in practical applications.

Examining the specifications, AMD EPYC 9565 surpasses Intel 6517P throughout many workloads. When it comes to productivity, the benchmark gap means smoother experiences. Consumers wanting top-tier capability might evaluate AMD EPYC 9565 as the stronger selection. Its multi-core capability is notably outstanding. Modern workloads continually benefit from several execution resources.

The bottom line: AMD EPYC 9565 wins this battle decisively. Those valuing capability would strongly choose AMD EPYC 9565 over Intel 6517P. This performance numbers validates this conclusion. The workloads should benefit from its higher capabilities. This is a straightforward victor in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9565

6517P

Core Specs

Cores

16 -77.8%

Threads

144

32 -77.8%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.15

3.2 +1.6%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.3

4.2 -2.3%

Frequency (GHz)

3.15

3.2 +1.6%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.3

4.2 -2.3%

Multiplier

31.5

32 +1.6%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

384 MB (shared)

72 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

400

190 -52.5%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

99,780 million

—

Die Size

12x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

3 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$10486

$1195

Part Number

100-000001447

SRVU4

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

103°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9565 Details View Xeon 6517P Details