AMD EPYC 9554P vs AMD Ryzen 5 220 Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD EPYC 9554P has 64 cores and 128 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 6 cores and 12 threads. This is a 10.7x core advantage for the EPYC part.

Q: How do the two chips compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 wins the Geekbench single-core test with a score of 2027 against 1911 for the EPYC 9554P, a 6.1% advantage. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the EPYC scores 12633 versus 2188 for the Ryzen, a reversal that reflects the different benchmark workloads.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The EPYC 9554P supports twelve-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 460.8 GB/s. The Ryzen 5 220 uses dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s. The EPYC delivers 5.1x the memory bandwidth.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The EPYC 9554P supports ECC memory, while the Ryzen 5 220 does not. This is a critical distinction for server and workstation reliability.

Q: What are the process nodes for each chip?

A: The Ryzen 5 220 is built on TSMC's 4 nm node, while the EPYC 9554P uses a 5 nm node. The Ryzen also has a smaller die at 137 mm² versus 8x 72 mm² for the EPYC.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the Ryzen 5 220 includes integrated graphics, specifically a Radeon 740M. The EPYC 9554P has no integrated graphics, which is typical for a server processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD EPYC 9554P share the same Zen 4 architecture but are engineered for entirely different purposes. The Ryzen 5 220, codenamed Hawk Point, is a mobile processor with 6 cores and 12 threads. It uses a monolithic 137 mm² die fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process, containing 20,900 million transistors. The EPYC 9554P, codenamed Genoa, is a server/workstation part with 64 cores and 128 threads, built from 8 chiplets of 72 mm² each on a 5 nm process, totaling 52,560 million transistors.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. Both have 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, but the L3 cache is where they diverge: the Ryzen has 16 MB shared, while the EPYC offers 256 MB shared — a 16x difference. This massive L3 pool is essential for the EPYC's server workloads, where data residency and repeated access patterns benefit from large caches.

Memory support also separates these two. The Ryzen 5 220 runs dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and no ECC support. The EPYC 9554P uses twelve-channel DDR5 with 460.8 GB/s bandwidth and ECC support. PCIe connectivity is equally lopsided: the Ryzen provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, while the EPYC provides Gen 5 with 128 CPU lanes — a 9.1x lane advantage and a full generation newer.

Power envelopes contrast sharply: the Ryzen has a 28 W TDP, while the EPYC consumes 360 W. This 12.9x difference reflects the target markets. The Ryzen 5 220 belongs to the mobile segment, with a release date of 2025-01-05, while the EPYC 9554P is a server part released on 2022-11-09. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split. The EPYC 9554P wins 7 of the 8 head-to-head benchmarks, with decisive margins in every multi-threaded test. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 89490 dwarfs the Ryzen's 15502 — a 82.7% delta. For workloads that scale across cores — rendering, scientific computing, virtualization, database processing — the EPYC is the only choice from this data.

The Ryzen 5 220, however, wins the Geekbench single-core test by 6.1% (2027 vs 1911). It also has integrated graphics and a much lower TDP of 28 W versus 360 W. For mobile or power-constrained scenarios where a discrete GPU is not available and single-thread responsiveness matters, the Ryzen holds a niche advantage.

The average benchmark scores tell a nuanced story: the Ryzen 5 220 has an average score of 22289, while the EPYC 9554P averages 21899. Both sit at the 75th percentile among all CPUs. The Ryzen's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-10700K (0.3% ahead) and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600X (1.4% behind), while the EPYC's nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 9534 (0% delta) and the Intel Core i7-11700 (0% delta). This suggests that in typical mixed workloads, the Ryzen 5 220 is competitive with desktop parts from a few generations back, while the EPYC matches other high-core server chips.

The verdict is simple: choose the EPYC 9554P for compute density and multi-threaded throughput. Choose the Ryzen 5 220 for mobility, integrated graphics, and a small fraction of the power draw.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 5 220 | AMD EPYC 9554P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 6 | 64 |

| Threads | 12 | 128 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 3.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | 3.75 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 360 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | AMD Socket SP5 |

| Codename | Hawk Point | Genoa |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 20,900 million | 52,560 million |

| Die Size | 137 mm² | 8x 72 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Twelve-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 460.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 740M | None |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2022-11-09 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $7104 |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head data shows a dominant performance gap in favor of the EPYC 9554P across Cinebench tests. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the EPYC scores 9020 against 1562 for the Ryzen, a delta of -82.7%. The same margin appears in Cinebench R20 multi-core (37585 vs 6510) and Cinebench R23 multi-core (89490 vs 15502). Every Cinebench test — single or multi-core — shows the EPYC ahead by exactly 82.7% in the delta calculation, indicating the Ryzen's scores are consistently a fraction of the EPYC's.

The Geekbench multi-core test narrows the gap somewhat: the EPYC scores 17978 versus 7974 for the Ryzen, a -55.6% delta. This is still a substantial EPYC win, but the margin is smaller than in Cinebench. The reason likely relates to the test's scaling behavior with 64 cores versus 6 cores.

The lone Ryzen victory comes in Geekbench single-core, where it scores 2027 against 1911 for the EPYC, a 6.1% advantage. This is the only benchmark where the Ryzen's higher boost clock (4.90 GHz vs 3.75 GHz) translates into a measurable win. The Ryzen's boost clock is 1.15 GHz higher than the EPYC's, which explains its edge in lightly threaded workloads.

PassMark results are only available for the Ryzen 5 220, so no direct comparison exists there. The Ryzen's PassMark multi-thread score is 18582, with a single-thread score of 3646. Its best PassMark subtest is data compression at 212739, while find prime numbers scores just 65. These numbers are not comparable to the EPYC, which lacks PassMark entries in the data.

Where Each One Wins

The EPYC 9554P wins in every scenario that leverages multiple cores. Cinebench R23 multi-core shows an 82.7% lead, which corresponds to rendering, video encoding, and 3D animation workloads. The 256 MB L3 cache and 460.8 GB/s memory bandwidth make it suitable for large in-memory databases, virtualization hosts, and scientific simulations. The twelve-channel memory bus and 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide the I/O headroom for dense storage arrays and high-speed networking. ECC memory support further cements its position for data integrity in server environments.

The Ryzen 5 220 wins where power and integration matter. Its 28 W TDP is 12.9x lower than the EPYC's 360 W, making it viable for laptops and compact mobile devices. The integrated Radeon 740M graphics eliminates the need for a discrete GPU in basic display and media scenarios. The Geekbench single-core win by 6.1% suggests it handles everyday responsiveness tasks — web browsing, office productivity, light coding — at least as well as the EPYC, if not better. Its smaller 137 mm² die and 4 nm process also hint at efficiency gains, though no direct power consumption data is available for comparison.

The average benchmark scores place both chips at the 75th percentile, but their nearest rivals reveal different competitive landscapes. The Ryzen 5 220 trades blows with the Intel Core i7-10700K (0.3% difference) and Intel Core i5-13500H (-0.8% difference), indicating it performs like a mid-range desktop or high-end mobile chip. The EPYC 9554P matches the AMD EPYC 9534 exactly (0% delta) and sits near the Intel Core i7-11700 (0% delta), showing it is a standard-bearer in its server class. The Ryzen 5 220's only head-to-head win is single-core Geekbench, while the EPYC wins all multi-threaded tests and even single-core Cinebench tests. For users choosing between these two, the decision rests entirely on workload type: the EPYC for throughput, the Ryzen for mobility and integration.