CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9554

CORE STATE Genoa

CORE SPECS 64 Cores / 128 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 3.75 GHz Turbo

CACHE 256 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 360W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6737P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.9 Base / 4 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 270W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

9,319

6,822

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

1,315

963

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

38,831

28,428

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

5,481

4,013

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

92,457

67,688

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

13,052

N/A

passmark_data_compression

N/A

1,157,255

passmark_data_encryption

N/A

65,615

passmark_extended_instructions

N/A

105,453

passmark_find_prime_numbers

N/A

697

passmark_floating_point_math

N/A

258,811

passmark_integer_math

N/A

330,756

passmark_multithread

N/A

79,634

passmark_physics

N/A

9,362

passmark_random_string_sorting

N/A

129,510

passmark_single_thread

N/A

3,048

passmark_singlethread

N/A

3,048

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9554 vs Intel Xeon 6737P

AMD EPYC 9554 and 6737P deliver almost identical processing power in this analysis. Any variations between the processors land within benchmark noise, suggesting each can fulfill users comparably adequately. The equivalence renders the determination nuanced. Other considerations turn particularly relevant. Availability usually influences the scales.

Neither option maintains a overwhelming superiority between them. AMD EPYC 9554 beats narrowly in specific workloads, while 6737P wins different ones. The back-and-forth trend demonstrates inherent balance between them. The differences are slight and probably imperceptible in actual applications. Either provide solid results.

Game performance tests additionally show close results between AMD EPYC 9554 and 6737P. Frame rates differences usually remain under single digits. This small variations are rarely noticeable during actual gameplay. Each processors offer fluid experiences. Gaming enthusiasts should choose safely between the options.

Finally, builders could select based on availability as opposed to absolute speed alone. The two AMD EPYC 9554 and 6737P offer strong capability for their given categories. This selection hinges on specific requirements. Either option is solid. Users won't go badly here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9554

6737P

Core Specs

Cores

32 -50.0%

Threads

128

64 -50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.1

2.9 -6.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.75

4 +6.7%

Frequency (GHz)

3.1

2.9 -6.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.75

4 +6.7%

Multiplier

29 -6.5%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

256 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

360

270 -25.0%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Granite Rapids

Codename

Genoa

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

52,560 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$9087

$4995

Part Number

100-100000790

SRVNZ

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

102°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9554 Details View Xeon 6737P Details