AMD EPYC 9454P vs Intel Core Ultra 7 268V Comparison

# Intel Core Ultra 7 268V vs AMD EPYC 9454P

The benchmark data in this comparison presents a stark division of roles. The AMD EPYC 9454P dominates nearly every multi-threaded and single-threaded compute test, winning 7 out of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V secures only a single victory in Geekbench single-core performance. The EPYC 9454P, a 48-core server processor, crushes the 8-core mobile chip in raw throughput, but the Intel part demonstrates superior efficiency in one specific workload metric, making the choice between them entirely dependent on whether the workload demands massive parallel compute or lighter, latency-sensitive tasks.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD EPYC 9454P is the clear winner for any workload that scales with core count or benefits from high sustained throughput. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81,492 dwarfs the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V's 10,653, a delta of -86.9% for the Intel part. This gap repeats across all Cinebench versions: R15 multi-core shows 8,214 versus 1,616 (-80.3%), and R20 multi-core shows 34,226 versus 6,887 (-79.9%). The EPYC also wins Geekbench multi-core with 19,941 against 9,963, exactly doubling the Intel score (-50%). For rendering, simulation, database processing, or any server-class workload, the EPYC 9454P is the only rational choice based on these numbers.

The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V wins precisely one benchmark: Geekbench single-core, where it scores 2,270 against the EPYC's 2,011, a 12.9% advantage. This indicates that in lightly-threaded, bursty workloads such as web browsing, office applications, or interactive user interfaces, the Intel part delivers snappier per-thread performance. However, the EPYC still wins all other single-thread tests: Cinebench R15 single-core (1,159 vs 293, -74.7%), R20 single-core (4,831 vs 972, -79.9%), and R23 single-core (11,504 vs 1,921, -83.3%). The Geekbench result stands as an anomaly within an otherwise one-sided dataset, suggesting the Intel architecture handles that specific workload pattern better.

The EPYC 9454P also carries the advantage in platform features that matter for server use. It supports ECC memory, has twelve-channel memory access with 460.8 GB/s bandwidth, and provides 128 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The Intel part has no ECC support, dual-channel memory, and only 4 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. For enterprise deployments, these platform-level differences amplify the compute gap.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is built on Lunar Lake architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process, and targets the mobile segment. It packs 8 cores and 8 threads, with a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The thermal design power is 17 watts, reflecting its ultra-portable intent. Its cache hierarchy includes 192 KB L1 per core, 2.5 MB L2 per core, and 12 MB shared L3. The integrated graphics is Arc 140V, and it uses the Intel BGA 2833 socket. The production status is Active, with a release date of September 2024.

The AMD EPYC 9454P belongs to the EPYC 9004 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the codename Genoa, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It is a server/workstation part with 48 cores and 96 threads, running at a base clock of 2.75 GHz and boost clock of 3.80 GHz. The thermal design power is 290 watts, nearly 17 times higher than the Intel chip. It contains 52,560 million transistors across 8 dies of 72 mm² each. Its cache design is markedly different: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 256 MB shared L3, which is over 21 times the Intel's L3 capacity. The EPYC supports DDR5 memory through twelve channels, enabling 460.8 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel part's memory support depends on the motherboard with dual-channel configuration. The EPYC also uses the AMD Socket SP5 and includes ECC memory support.

These architectural differences explain the benchmark results. The EPYC's six-fold core advantage (48 vs 8) and twelve-fold thread advantage (96 vs 8) directly drive the multi-core dominance. The larger L3 cache (256 MB vs 12 MB) likely contributes to its single-thread wins in Cinebench, where larger datasets benefit from cache locality. The Intel part's higher boost clock (5.00 GHz vs 3.80 GHz) helps in the Geekbench single-core test, but its lower power envelope and dual-channel memory limit sustained throughput.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear conclusion: the AMD EPYC 9454P is the superior processor for almost any compute-intensive task, and the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V is only preferable for specific low-power, single-threaded scenarios. The EPYC wins 7 of 8 head-to-head benchmarks, with margins ranging from -50% to -86.9% in the Intel's disadvantage. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the EPYC delivers 81,492 points versus 10,653, a 7.6x advantage that reflects its 48-core configuration. In Geekbench multi-core, the EPYC doubles the Intel score at 19,941 versus 9,963.

The Intel part's sole win in Geekbench single-core (2,270 vs 2,011, +12.9%) does not offset the EPYC's overwhelming single-thread wins elsewhere. The EPYC leads by 74.7% in Cinebench R15 single-core, 79.9% in R20 single-core, and 83.3% in R23 single-core. These are not marginal differences; they represent fundamental performance tiers.

For a mobile device or ultra-portable workstation where the 17-watt TDP and integrated Arc 140V graphics matter, the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V serves a purpose. But for any server, workstation, or data-center workload where ECC memory, 128 PCIe lanes, 460.8 GB/s memory bandwidth, and massive multi-thread performance are required, the AMD EPYC 9454P is the definitive choice. The EPYC's launch MSRP is $4598, which reflects its enterprise positioning. The database shows no scenario where the Intel part matches the EPYC in throughput, and only one narrow metric where it leads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The AMD EPYC 9454P has 48 cores and 96 threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V has 8 cores and 8 threads.

Q: How much faster is the EPYC 9454P in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The EPYC scores 81,492 points versus the Intel's 10,653, a difference of -86.9% for the Intel part.

Q: Does the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V win any benchmark?

A: Yes, it wins Geekbench single-core with 2,270 points against the EPYC's 2,011, a 12.9% advantage.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The EPYC 9454P supports 460.8 GB/s through twelve-channel DDR5 memory. The Intel part uses dual-channel memory with bandwidth depending on the motherboard.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD EPYC 9454P supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 268V does not.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Intel part has a TDP of 17 watts, while the AMD EPYC 9454P has a TDP of 290 watts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most decisive multi-core result comes from Cinebench R23, where the EPYC 9454P scores 81,492 against the Intel's 10,653, a -86.9% delta. This is the largest margin in the entire comparison. Cinebench R20 multi-core follows with 34,226 versus 6,887 (-79.9%), and R15 multi-core shows 8,214 versus 1,616 (-80.3%). Geekbench multi-core is the closest multi-threaded contest at 19,941 versus 9,963, a -50% delta, but still a complete doubling of the Intel score.

Single-thread results are similarly one-sided, with the exception of Geekbench. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the EPYC scores 11,504 versus 1,921 (-83.3%). R20 single-core shows 4,831 versus 972 (-79.9%), and R15 single-core shows 1,159 versus 293 (-74.7%). The EPYC's single-thread margins are substantial, indicating that its per-core performance is not merely adequate but actually dominant in these rendering workloads. The Intel part's boost clock of 5.00 GHz does not translate into Cinebench wins, likely due to thermal constraints or memory latency.

Geekbench single-core is the only test where the Intel part wins: 2,270 versus 2,011, a 12.9% advantage. This result suggests that the Intel Lunar Lake architecture handles the specific mix of integer, floating-point, and memory access patterns in Geekbench more efficiently than the Zen 4 architecture. Still, this single victory does not change the overall picture. The EPYC leads in 7 of 8 benchmarks, and its margins in the other tests are far larger than the Intel's one narrow win.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core Ultra 7 268V | AMD EPYC 9454P |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 48 |

| Threads | 8 | 96 |

| Base Clock | 2.20 GHz | 2.75 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 3.80 GHz |

| TDP | 17 W | 290 W |

| Process Node | 3 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | Not specified | 52,560 million |

| Die Size | Not specified | 8x 72 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 192 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 12 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | Depends on motherboard | DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Twelve-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | Not specified | 460.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | No | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 4 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 128 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Arc 140V | None |

| Socket | Intel BGA 2833 | AMD Socket SP5 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Server/Workstation |

| Release Date | 2024-09-23 | 2022-11-09 |

| Production Status | Active | Active |