CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9384X

CORE STATE Genoa-X

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 768 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6740E

CORE STATE Sierra Forest

CORE SPECS 96 Cores / 96 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 96 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 250W

ARCHITECTURE Sierra Forest

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

5,968

6,525

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

842

921

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

24,870

27,191

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,510

3,838

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

59,215

64,741

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

8,359

9,140

passmark_data_compression

1,119,983

1,786,845

passmark_data_encryption

72,631

137,106

passmark_extended_instructions

74,363

78,968

passmark_find_prime_numbers

596

526

passmark_floating_point_math

174,630

309,333

passmark_integer_math

297,833

457,614

passmark_multithread

69,665

76,167

passmark_physics

9,332

7,608

passmark_random_string_sorting

119,440

220,684

passmark_single_thread

3,015

1,997

passmark_singlethread

3,015

1,997

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9384X vs Intel Xeon 6740E

Benchmark hunters analyzing 6740E (Intel) versus AMD AMD EPYC 9384X should observe immediately that 6740E (Intel) claims the top spot. The processor dominates in intensive tasks, establishing it perfect for professionals. Its technical improvements over AMD AMD EPYC 9384X lead into noticeable everyday benefits. From productivity, 6740E (Intel) steadily outperforms its opponent. This gap is substantial sufficiently to affect actual experience.

Game performance results similarly advantage 6740E (Intel) in this evaluation. Better FPS and improved consistent delivery emerge from the better single-core capability. Gamers should experience better experiences, specifically in CPU-bound situations. This advantage holds in diverse resolutions. Fast-paced titles particularly advantages from this speed advantage.

For users making a acquisition determination, 6740E (Intel) comes out as the preferred selection. The consistent performance superiority over AMD AMD EPYC 9384X makes it the better choice for performance-oriented buyers. Consider your personal needs, however this results guides toward 6740E (Intel). Reach an smart determination. The capability difference is significant and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9384X

6740E

Core Specs

Cores

96 +200.0%

Threads

96 +50.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.1

2.4 -22.6%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.9

3.2 -17.9%

Frequency (GHz)

3.1

2.4 -22.6%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.9

3.2 -17.9%

Multiplier

25.5

24 -5.9%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

96 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

4 MB (per module)

L3 Cache

768 MB (shared)

96 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

250 -21.9%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Sierra Forest

Codename

Genoa-X

Sierra Forest

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Xeon 6 (Sierra Forest-SP)

Process Size

5 nm

Transistors

90,160 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

578 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

4 x24 20 GT/s

CXL

—

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$5529

$5265

Part Number

—

SRPFV

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

106°C

Bundled Cooler

None

View EPYC 9384X Details View Xeon 6740E Details