CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9384X

CORE STATE Genoa-X

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 3.9 GHz Turbo

CACHE 768 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

5,968

1,840

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

842

259

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

24,870

7,667

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,510

1,082

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

59,215

18,255

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

8,359

2,577

passmark_data_compression

1,119,983

219,535

passmark_data_encryption

72,631

11,131

passmark_extended_instructions

74,363

14,264

passmark_find_prime_numbers

596

passmark_floating_point_math

174,630

45,383

passmark_integer_math

297,833

60,462

passmark_multithread

69,665

18,597

passmark_physics

9,332

1,333

passmark_random_string_sorting

119,440

21,499

passmark_single_thread

3,015

3,595

passmark_singlethread

3,015

3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9384X vs Intel Core 5 120

If processing power is extremely comparable, the matchup between AMD's AMD EPYC 9384X and the Intel Intel Core 5 120 becomes especially complex. Both chips exchange blows in diverse tests. This combined assessment is one of remarkable parity. Not one emerges as a definite victor. The selection rests on individual priorities.

Game performance benchmarks similarly demonstrate close numbers between AMD's AMD EPYC 9384X and the Intel Intel Core 5 120. Smoothness deltas usually sit within testing variance. The minor gaps are hardly visible during real gaming sessions. The two chips offer fluid experiences. Players should choose safely between the options.

From a hardware viewpoint, AMD's AMD EPYC 9384X and the Intel Intel Core 5 120 have similar capabilities. Processing setups, frequency frequencies, and L3 sizes are closely equivalent. This specification equality justifies the similar benchmark results. None of the maintains a substantial specification lead. The matchup is level.

In conclusion, the analysis between AMD's AMD EPYC 9384X and the Intel Intel Core 5 120 results in a virtual tie. Processing gaps are minor and improbable to affect actual scenarios. Focus your determination on cost, platform preferences, and particular extra requirements. The two are capable selections. The draw is genuine.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9384X

5 120

Core Specs

Cores

6 -81.3%

Threads

12 -81.3%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.1

2.5 -19.4%

Boost Clock (GHz)

3.9

4.5 +15.4%

Frequency (GHz)

3.1

2.5 -19.4%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

3.9

4.5 +15.4%

Multiplier

25.5

25 -2.0%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

768 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

65 -79.7%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

110 W

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4

Raptor Lake

Codename

Genoa-X

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

90,160 million

—

Die Size

8x 72 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

460.8 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 730

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$5529

$211

Part Number

—

SA35V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 9384X Details View Core 5 120 Details