CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9354

CORE STATE Genoa
CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 3.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 256 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 280W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
6,221
1,840
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
878
259
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
25,923
7,667
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
3,659
1,082
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
61,722
18,255
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
8,713
2,577
passmark_data_compression
1,168,626
219,535
passmark_data_encryption
71,400
11,131
passmark_extended_instructions
86,176
14,264
passmark_find_prime_numbers
934
77
passmark_floating_point_math
188,894
45,383
passmark_integer_math
304,828
60,462
passmark_multithread
72,615
18,597
passmark_physics
9,281
1,333
passmark_random_string_sorting
140,690
21,499
passmark_single_thread
2,601
3,595
passmark_singlethread
2,601
3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9354 vs Intel Core 5 120

AMD EPYC 9354 by AMD and Intel Intel Core 5 120 processor deliver almost equivalent processing power in every evaluation. Any differences between both chips remain under testing variance, suggesting each can serve buyers comparably effectively. The parity positions the determination nuanced. Secondary variables turn especially significant. Value frequently influences the choice.

As opposed to dwelling on slight performance differences, future consumers should consider additional factors. thermal performance, acoustics, ecosystem expenses, and functionality typically play a role larger than small processing differences. All these variables might sway the decision. Consider broadly. This broader context plays a role.

Considering a technical standpoint, AMD EPYC 9354 by AMD and Intel Intel Core 5 120 processor share matching specifications. Processing setups, speed frequencies, and memory subsystem capacities are tightly matched. This hardware equivalence explains the similar test results. No maintains a significant specification advantage. This comparison is level.

For people torn between AMD EPYC 9354 by AMD and Intel Intel Core 5 120 processor, feel certain that both pick offers similar capability. This benchmark numbers validates nil obvious leader. Form your determination on secondary elements and benefit from excellent results either way. Either are champions in this own sense. Select comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9354
5 120
Core Specs
Cores
32
6 -81.3%
Threads
64
12 -81.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.25
2.5 -23.1%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3.8
4.5 +18.4%
Frequency (GHz)
3.25
2.5 -23.1%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3.8
4.5 +18.4%
Multiplier
32.5
25 -23.1%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
280
65 -76.8%
PL1
65 W
PL2
110 W
Configurable TDP
240-300 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4
Raptor Lake
Codename
Genoa
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4 (Genoa))
Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
52,560 million
Die Size
8x 72 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
460.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$3420
$211
Part Number
100-100000798
SA35V
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
Laminar RM1
View EPYC 9354 Details View Core 5 120 Details