CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9255

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 128 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6507P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 48 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 150W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

6,483

2,676

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

915

377

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

27,013

11,150

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,813

1,573

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

64,318

26,548

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

9,080

3,747

passmark_data_compression

1,018,904

356,190

passmark_data_encryption

59,668

17,753

passmark_extended_instructions

75,185

27,385

passmark_find_prime_numbers

580

224

passmark_floating_point_math

183,367

69,604

passmark_integer_math

306,442

88,877

passmark_multithread

76,580

31,233

passmark_physics

9,740

2,935

passmark_random_string_sorting

129,202

39,682

passmark_single_thread

3,655

3,643

passmark_singlethread

3,655

3,643

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Xeon 6507P

If processing power is extremely comparable, this evaluation between AMD EPYC 9255 and Intel 6507P processor grows more complex. Both processors swap leads in diverse tests. This aggregate picture is one of remarkable equivalence. Not one appears as a obvious winner. The choice hinges on particular requirements.

Game performance tests additionally reveal matched performance between AMD EPYC 9255 and Intel 6507P processor. Frame rates variations often sit below 5-10%. The minor variations are barely noticeable during everyday gaming. Either processors offer fluid results. Players should decide confidently between these two.

Considering a engineering viewpoint, AMD EPYC 9255 and Intel 6507P processor have equivalent hardware. Core configurations, frequency clocks, and cache hierarchy configurations are nearly comparable. The spec equivalence justifies the close performance results. Not one holds a notable specification lead. This competition is fair.

For those torn between AMD EPYC 9255 and Intel 6507P processor, feel assured that either pick offers equivalent throughput. The test results demonstrates nil decisive champion. Make your determination on additional variables and benefit from solid capability in any case. The two are winners in their given regard. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9255

6507P

Core Specs

Cores

8 -66.7%

Threads

16 -66.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.25

3.5 +7.7%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.3 -10.4%

Frequency (GHz)

3.25

3.5 +7.7%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.3 -10.4%

Multiplier

32.5

35 +7.7%

SMP CPUs

2 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

128 MB (shared)

48 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

150 -25.0%

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

33,260 million

—

Die Size

4x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

UPI Links

—

3 x24 24 GT/s

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$2495

$765

Part Number

100-000000694

SRVU5

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

103°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9255 Details View Xeon 6507P Details