CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9255

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 128 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 7 240H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 10 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 24 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

6,483

2,053

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

915

289

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

27,013

8,558

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,813

1,208

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

64,318

20,378

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

9,080

2,877

passmark_data_compression

1,018,904

271,774

passmark_data_encryption

59,668

15,155

passmark_extended_instructions

75,185

16,897

passmark_find_prime_numbers

580

102

passmark_floating_point_math

183,367

58,905

passmark_integer_math

306,442

80,396

passmark_multithread

76,580

23,975

passmark_physics

9,740

1,723

passmark_random_string_sorting

129,202

28,866

passmark_single_thread

3,655

3,782

passmark_singlethread

3,655

3,782

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Core 7 240H

Benchmark hunters evaluating AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip with Intel Core 7 240H (Intel) will find quickly that AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip secures the crown. This CPU dominates in demanding workloads, positioning it ideal for enthusiasts. Its engineering advances over Intel Core 7 240H (Intel) lead into tangible everyday benefits. Whether it's productivity, AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip consistently outperforms its opponent. This margin is notable sufficiently to affect practical scenarios.

Based on a engineering angle, AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip boasts superior cache, higher turbo speeds, and additional efficient thermal management. All these aspects unite to offer dependably higher scores throughout diverse applications. The architectural improvements render AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip a attractive option. Whether you're processing, the CPU executes it efficiently. Professionals might especially value these benefits.

Overall, AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip represents the better choice in this analysis. Its benchmark advantages validate examination for users assembling a demanding PC. Although Intel Core 7 240H (Intel) offers its positives, this test results obviously favors AMD's AMD EPYC 9255 chip. Reach your conclusion accordingly. This performance difference is significant sufficiently to impact.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9255

7 240H

Core Specs

Cores

10 -58.3%

Threads

16 -66.7%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.25

2.5 -23.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

5.2 +8.3%

Frequency (GHz)

3.25

2.5 -23.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

5.2 +8.3%

Multiplier

32.5

25 -23.1%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

128 MB (shared)

24 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

45 -77.5%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

33,260 million

—

Die Size

4x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1800 MHz up to 4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 64EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$2495

$502

Part Number

100-000000694

SRQ6TQ5ML

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9255 Details View Core 7 240H Details