CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9255

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 128 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 210H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 12 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

6,483

1,563

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

915

220

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

27,013

6,515

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,813

919

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

64,318

15,514

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

9,080

2,190

passmark_data_compression

1,018,904

217,805

passmark_data_encryption

59,668

12,187

passmark_extended_instructions

75,185

13,370

passmark_find_prime_numbers

580

passmark_floating_point_math

183,367

45,057

passmark_integer_math

306,442

61,503

passmark_multithread

76,580

18,252

passmark_physics

9,740

1,040

passmark_random_string_sorting

129,202

23,451

passmark_single_thread

3,655

3,539

passmark_singlethread

3,655

3,539

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Core 5 210H

When comparing Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor compared to AMD AMD EPYC 9255 CPU, the difference becomes immediately apparent. With higher multi-core capabilities, Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor provides significantly speedier results in resource-hungry applications. This thread configuration edge leads immediately into everyday advantages. Benchmark results supports this assessment. People looking for raw speed should appreciate the advantages that Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor offers to the equation.

Game performance tests furthermore support Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor in this comparison. Improved frame rates and improved consistent frame pacing result from its higher IPC throughput. Gaming enthusiasts might feel smoother experiences, particularly in CPU-demanding titles. This benefit persists in various scenarios. Multiplayer scenarios notably gains from this throughput edge.

Overall, Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor delivers the superior pick in this comparison. Its processing edges support examination for those constructing a capable PC. Though AMD AMD EPYC 9255 CPU has its merits, this performance results clearly favors Intel Intel Core 5 210H processor. Make your choice accordingly. The performance gap is notable sufficiently to matter.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9255

5 210H

Core Specs

Cores

8 -66.7%

Threads

12 -75.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.25

2.2 -32.3%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.8 0.0%

Frequency (GHz)

3.25

2.2 -32.3%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.8 0.0%

Multiplier

32.5

22 -32.3%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

128 MB (shared)

12 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

45 -77.5%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-H

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

33,260 million

—

Die Size

4x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel BGA 1744

Chipsets

—

WM790, HM770

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1600 MHz up to 3.6 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Mobile

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$2495

$342

Part Number

100-000000694

SRQ6RQ5MN

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-BGA16F

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9255 Details View Core 5 210H Details