CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9255

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 24 Cores / 48 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.25 Base / 4.8 GHz Turbo

CACHE 128 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 200W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 65W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

6,483

1,840

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

915

259

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

27,013

7,667

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,813

1,082

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

64,318

18,255

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

9,080

2,577

passmark_data_compression

1,018,904

219,535

passmark_data_encryption

59,668

11,131

passmark_extended_instructions

75,185

14,264

passmark_find_prime_numbers

580

passmark_floating_point_math

183,367

45,383

passmark_integer_math

306,442

60,462

passmark_multithread

76,580

18,597

passmark_physics

9,740

1,333

passmark_random_string_sorting

129,202

21,499

passmark_single_thread

3,655

3,595

passmark_singlethread

3,655

3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9255 vs Intel Core 5 120

AMD AMD EPYC 9255 processor and Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU offer almost matching benchmark scores in our comparison. The variations between both chips sit under margin of error, implying both could fulfill buyers equally adequately. The balance positions the choice multifaceted. Alternative variables get particularly critical. Cost often tips the choice.

In-game performance also show close numbers between AMD AMD EPYC 9255 processor and Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU. Frame rates variations often land inside single digits. Such marginal variations are rarely perceptible during everyday play sessions. Either CPUs deliver smooth performance. Gamers might choose safely between them.

For those torn between AMD AMD EPYC 9255 processor and Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU, be confident that each selection provides similar throughput. The benchmark figures demonstrates zero clear leader. Make your selection on alternative considerations and experience excellent results either way. The two are excellent in their particular sense. Go with comfortably.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9255

5 120

Core Specs

Cores

6 -75.0%

Threads

12 -75.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.25

2.5 -23.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Frequency (GHz)

3.25

2.5 -23.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.8

4.5 -6.2%

Multiplier

32.5

25 -23.1%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

128 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

200

65 -67.5%

PL1

—

65 W

PL2

—

110 W

Configurable TDP

200-240 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

33,260 million

—

Die Size

4x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

UHD Graphics 730

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$2495

$211

Part Number

100-000000694

SA35V

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

—

Laminar RM1

View EPYC 9255 Details View Core 5 120 Details