CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9175F

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 4.2 Base / 5 GHz Turbo

CACHE 512 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 320W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6731P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 32 Cores / 64 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 144 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 245W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

5,636

4,522

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

795

638

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

23,487

18,845

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

3,315

2,660

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

55,923

44,871

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

7,895

6,334

passmark_data_compression

867,186

799,474

passmark_data_encryption

42,297

40,087

passmark_extended_instructions

70,529

65,656

passmark_find_prime_numbers

741

541

passmark_floating_point_math

145,939

157,330

passmark_integer_math

219,800

198,761

passmark_multithread

67,634

52,790

passmark_physics

9,984

7,105

passmark_random_string_sorting

95,783

88,019

passmark_single_thread

4,256

2,107

passmark_singlethread

4,256

2,107

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9175F vs Intel Xeon 6731P

Reviewing the test numbers for AMD AMD EPYC 9175F processor and Intel 6731P processor, a story of similar performance appears. Not one chip dominates reliably in all workloads. This trading of victories indicates fundamental equivalence. Buyers confront a true choice in this matchup. Either processors deliver strong capability.

In-game performance likewise demonstrate close performance between AMD AMD EPYC 9175F processor and Intel 6731P processor. FPS gaps typically remain within testing variance. The marginal gaps are seldom perceptible during real play sessions. Both options deliver responsive performance. Gaming enthusiasts should pick safely between both chips.

Neither option maintains a decisive lead between them. AMD AMD EPYC 9175F processor wins narrowly in specific benchmarks, while Intel 6731P processor takes other benchmarks. The alternating dynamic implies core equivalence between them. The gaps are small and probably imperceptible in everyday applications. Each achieve strong capability.

Ultimately: AMD AMD EPYC 9175F processor and Intel 6731P processor are closely matched. No earns a undisputed recommendation over the competitor. Allow value and chipset choices influence your eventual choice. Either options should fulfill you capably. This is a solid choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9175F

6731P

Core Specs

Cores

32 +100.0%

Threads

64 +100.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

4.2

2.5 -40.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1 -18.0%

Frequency (GHz)

4.2

2.5 -40.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1 -18.0%

Multiplier

25 -40.5%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

512 MB (shared)

144 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

320

245 -23.4%

Configurable TDP

320-400 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

133,040 million

—

Die Size

16x 70.6 mm²

598 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 136 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$4256

$2700

Part Number

100-000001145

SRVNR

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

102°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9175F Details View Xeon 6731P Details