CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9115

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 9 270H

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-H
CORE SPECS 14 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.8 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 45W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
4,233
2,464
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
597
347
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
17,641
10,268
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
2,490
1,449
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
42,003
24,449
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
5,929
3,451
passmark_data_compression
600,099
333,785
passmark_data_encryption
33,489
19,369
passmark_extended_instructions
45,477
20,079
passmark_find_prime_numbers
289
112
passmark_floating_point_math
113,853
70,640
passmark_integer_math
181,807
97,654
passmark_multithread
48,936
28,764
passmark_physics
4,188
1,966
passmark_random_string_sorting
70,151
36,867
passmark_single_thread
3,360
3,944
passmark_singlethread
3,360
3,944

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9115 vs Intel Core 9 270H

Throughout this direct evaluation, AMD EPYC 9115 comes out as the definite winner. Its performance figures show considerable advantages in every multi-threaded tests. Whether you're constructing a workstation PC, AMD EPYC 9115 offers superior performance at this tier. This silicon manages heavy computations with capability. It's particularly evident in everyday scenarios.

The test gap between AMD EPYC 9115 and Intel Intel Core 9 270H grows particularly pronounced in all-core scenarios. Applications like code compilation demonstrate AMD EPYC 9115's superiority. Its additional execution units give significant capability for heavy workloads. Such performance results into faster render durations. Output improvements are noticeable and significant.

Based on a hardware angle, AMD EPYC 9115 offers enhanced L3, increased boost clocks, and greater efficient heat control. All these aspects combine to provide steadily better benchmarks over different scenarios. This engineering enhancements establish AMD EPYC 9115 a solid option. Whether you're encoding, the processor manages it effectively. Enthusiasts can especially benefit from these gains.

Ultimately: AMD EPYC 9115 claims this battle convincingly. Consumers valuing speed would certainly choose AMD EPYC 9115 over Intel Intel Core 9 270H. The test results supports this assessment. Your applications might benefit from the higher performance. This is a definite winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9115
9 270H
Core Specs
Cores
16
14 -12.5%
Threads
32
20 -37.5%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.6
2.7 +3.8%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.1
5.8 +41.5%
Frequency (GHz)
2.6
2.7 +3.8%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.1
5.8 +41.5%
Multiplier
26
27 +3.8%
SMP CPUs
2
1 -50.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
125
45 -64.0%
PL1
45 W
PL2
115 W
Configurable TDP
120-155 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Raptor Lake
Codename
Turin
Raptor Lake-H
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Core 9 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
4 nm
10 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
5200 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel BGA 1744
Chipsets
WM790, HM770
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 6 E-Cores: 8
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 4.1 GHz
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Interconnect
CXL
Gen 2.0
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Mobile
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$726
$697
Part Number
100-000001552
SRQ6V
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-BGA16F
Tj Max
100°C
View EPYC 9115 Details View Core 9 270H Details