CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6511P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids

CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.3 Base / 4.2 GHz Turbo

CACHE 72 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 150W

ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

640,808

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

31,429

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

50,730

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

308

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

127,307

passmark_integer_math

92,524

162,524

passmark_multithread

30,689

45,687

passmark_physics

2,893

4,678

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

67,809

passmark_single_thread

3,265

2,545

passmark_singlethread

3,265

2,545

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

3,914

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

552

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

16,309

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

2,302

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

38,833

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

5,482

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6511P

6511P from Intel and the AMD AMD EPYC 9015 provide almost equal performance in the test. The differences between the processors fall within margin of error, suggesting either can satisfy builders just as well. This parity positions the determination multifaceted. Additional considerations get especially significant. Value frequently tips the scales.

From a hardware perspective, 6511P from Intel and the AMD AMD EPYC 9015 possess comparable hardware. Core arrangements, frequency frequencies, and memory subsystem sizes are virtually comparable. This hardware equivalence explains the comparable benchmark data. Not one possesses a significant hardware edge. The comparison is fair.

Rather than focusing on small frame rate differences, potential users can consider additional elements. Power efficiency, acoustics, total build cost, and extras typically matter greater than marginal processing differences. All these considerations could tip the decision. Evaluate comprehensively. This broader context matters.

Ultimately: 6511P from Intel and the AMD AMD EPYC 9015 are closely competitive. None of the merits a undisputed preference over the other. Make value and platform preferences guide your concluding selection. Each options will fulfill you capably. This is a safe decision.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6511P

Core Specs

Cores

16 +100.0%

Threads

32 +100.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

2.3 -36.1%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.2 +2.4%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

2.3 -36.1%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

4.2 +2.4%

Multiplier

23 -36.1%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

112 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

72 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

150 +20.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Granite Rapids

Codename

Turin

Granite Rapids

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)

Process Size

4 nm

5 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Eight-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

409.6 GB/s

ECC Memory

Yes

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 4710

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 136 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

10 nm

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$815

Part Number

100-000001553

SRVU9

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA18N

Tj Max

—

98°C

Bundled Cooler

—

None

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6511P Details