CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 64 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6505P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.2 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo
CACHE 48 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 150W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
353,014
480,368
passmark_data_encryption
17,790
24,458
passmark_extended_instructions
27,970
37,515
passmark_find_prime_numbers
304
217
passmark_floating_point_math
61,615
92,992
passmark_integer_math
92,524
120,456
passmark_multithread
30,689
38,456
passmark_physics
2,893
2,991
passmark_random_string_sorting
39,772
52,372
passmark_single_thread
3,265
3,187
passmark_singlethread
3,265
3,187
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
3,294
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
464
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
13,728
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
1,937
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
32,687
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
4,614

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6505P

The comparison between AMD AMD EPYC 9015 and the 6505P chip from Intel shows remarkably close benchmark scores. Each options offer similar scores throughout typical benchmarks, leaving the choice mainly reliant on price. This score numbers supports this finding. No processor holds a decisive edge. Users might decide based on additional variables.

As opposed to obsessing on marginal frame rate variations, interested users might evaluate other elements. thermal performance, noise levels, ecosystem expenses, and capabilities typically are important bigger than slight benchmark improvements. All these elements could affect the scales. Think broadly. The bigger context counts.

Not one chip has a decisive superiority here. AMD AMD EPYC 9015 wins slightly in specific workloads, while the 6505P chip from Intel secures different ones. The alternating dynamic implies underlying parity between both chips. The variations are marginal and likely unnoticeable in actual tasks. Both provide solid performance.

All things considered, the analysis between AMD AMD EPYC 9015 and the 6505P chip from Intel ends in a effective tie. Speed gaps are small and improbable to impact everyday usage. Center your determination on availability, platform preferences, and specific functionality needs. The two are solid options. The balance is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 9015
6505P
Core Specs
Cores
8
12 +50.0%
Threads
16
24 +50.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
3.6
2.2 -38.9%
Boost Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.1 0.0%
Frequency (GHz)
3.6
2.2 -38.9%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
4.1
4.1 0.0%
Multiplier
36
22 -38.9%
SMP CPUs
2
2 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
64 MB (shared)
48 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
125
150 +20.0%
Configurable TDP
120-155 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Turin
Granite Rapids
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
16,630 million
Die Size
2x 70.6 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP5
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
Gen 2.0
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$527
$563
Part Number
100-000001553
SRVU7
Package
FC-LGA6096
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
97°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6505P Details