CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 9015

CORE STATE Turin

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.1 GHz Turbo

CACHE 64 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 125W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 5

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

Intel

INTEL

Xeon 6337P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R

CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 3.5 Base / 5.3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 18 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 80W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression

353,014

237,373

passmark_data_encryption

17,790

12,604

passmark_extended_instructions

27,970

15,366

passmark_find_prime_numbers

304

108

passmark_floating_point_math

61,615

53,150

passmark_integer_math

92,524

72,301

passmark_multithread

30,689

22,098

passmark_physics

2,893

1,729

passmark_random_string_sorting

39,772

26,135

passmark_single_thread

3,265

4,104

passmark_singlethread

3,265

4,104

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

N/A

1,893

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

N/A

267

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

N/A

7,888

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

N/A

1,113

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

N/A

18,783

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

N/A

2,651

Analysis: AMD EPYC 9015 vs Intel Xeon 6337P

Reviewing the test numbers for Intel Xeon 6337P and AMD EPYC 9015 from AMD, a story of matched processing develops. Not one CPU wins steadily in most tests. This swapping of advantages means underlying balance. Buyers face a genuine choice here. Each chips deliver competent capability.

In-game results likewise indicate matched results between Intel Xeon 6337P and AMD EPYC 9015 from AMD. Frame rates differences often fall within single digits. This marginal differences are barely noticeable during actual gaming. The two options provide smooth gaming. Gaming enthusiasts could select assuredly between the options.

Over dwelling on slight frame rate variations, future builders can consider other variables. energy consumption, cooling, total build cost, and feature sets frequently matter larger than marginal benchmark gains. All these elements could sway the scales. Evaluate holistically. This larger view is important.

At the end of the day: Intel Xeon 6337P and AMD EPYC 9015 from AMD are closely comparable. Neither merits a obvious recommendation over the other. Make availability and platform choices inform your eventual decision. The two CPUs will satisfy you adequately. It's a solid scenario.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 9015

6337P

Core Specs

Cores

6 -25.0%

Threads

12 -25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

3.6

3.5 -2.8%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.3 +29.3%

Frequency (GHz)

3.6

3.5 -2.8%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.1

5.3 +29.3%

Multiplier

35 -2.8%

SMP CPUs

1 -50.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

1.25 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

64 MB (shared)

18 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

125

80 -36.0%

Configurable TDP

120-155 W

—

Architecture

Zen 5

Raptor Lake

Codename

Turin

Raptor Lake-R

Generation

EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)

Process Size

4 nm

10 nm

Transistors

16,630 million

—

Die Size

2x 70.6 mm²

163 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Twelve-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

4800 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP5

Intel Socket 1700

Chipsets

—

C262, C266

PCIe

Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Interconnect

CXL

Gen 2.0

—

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$527

$375

Part Number

100-000001553

SRPLU

Package

FC-LGA6096

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

View EPYC 9015 Details View Xeon 6337P Details