CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6357P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3 Base / 5.4 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 80W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,761
2,635
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
248
372
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,338
10,980
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,035
1,550
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,472
26,145
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,466
3,691
passmark_data_compression
232,242
353,521
passmark_data_encryption
15,809
18,324
passmark_extended_instructions
14,251
24,490
passmark_find_prime_numbers
109
149
passmark_floating_point_math
34,757
74,460
passmark_integer_math
62,128
97,375
passmark_multithread
20,556
30,759
passmark_physics
1,905
2,305
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,613
35,495
passmark_single_thread
2,371
4,233
passmark_singlethread
2,371
4,233

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Xeon 6357P

Reviewing the test numbers for the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD and Intel's 6357P, a pattern of similar capability unfolds. No chip dominates steadily throughout the tests. This back-and-forth of wins means core balance. Those have a true choice with these options. Each CPUs offer competent performance.

Game performance tests likewise show close performance between the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD and Intel's 6357P. Performance variations often sit inside margin of error. This slight gaps are rarely detectable during everyday play sessions. Both chips achieve capable results. Gaming enthusiasts could pick comfortably between them.

Neither chip possesses a definitive lead between them. the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD leads marginally in specific tests, while Intel's 6357P claims others. This back-and-forth pattern indicates fundamental balance between both chips. Any variations are minor and potentially negligible in actual scenarios. Either provide capable results.

In conclusion, the analysis between the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD and Intel's 6357P results in a effective tie. Performance gaps are small and unlikely to influence actual applications. Direct your choice on price, chipset considerations, and particular capability priorities. Each are capable options. This tie is actual.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8024P
6357P
Core Specs
Cores
8
8 0.0%
Threads
16
16 0.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
3 +25.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
5.4 +80.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
3 +25.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
5.4 +80.0%
Multiplier
24
30 +25.0%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
24 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
90
80 -11.1%
Configurable TDP
70-100 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Raptor Lake
Codename
Siena
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,875 million
Die Size
73 mm²
257 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel Socket 1700
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$409
$556
Part Number
100-000001136
SRPLR
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 8024P Details View Xeon 6357P Details