CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6333P

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.1 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,761
1,574
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
248
222
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,338
6,559
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,035
925
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,472
15,617
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,466
2,204
passmark_data_compression
232,242
199,886
passmark_data_encryption
15,809
11,025
passmark_extended_instructions
14,251
13,039
passmark_find_prime_numbers
109
83
passmark_floating_point_math
34,757
43,801
passmark_integer_math
62,128
61,458
passmark_multithread
20,556
18,374
passmark_physics
1,905
1,320
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,613
22,010
passmark_single_thread
2,371
3,450
passmark_singlethread
2,371
3,450

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Xeon 6333P

Analyzing the score figures for the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD and 6333P from Intel, a definite picture emerges. the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD reliably achieves better numbers in diverse tests. This benchmark advantage ranges from substantial to outstanding based on the particular workload. This steadiness points to fundamental technical improvements. Buyers wanting capability should consider this.

In-game results similarly support the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD in this comparison. Better frame rates and better reliable frame times follow from its better per-core throughput. Gaming enthusiasts might experience smoother gameplay, notably in CPU-bound scenarios. The advantage holds across multiple configurations. Multiplayer games notably benefits from this throughput lead.

The performance gap between the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD and 6333P from Intel turns notably evident in all-core workloads. Workloads like 3D rendering reveal the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD's advantages. Its greater execution units deliver significant capability for intensive scenarios. This performance converts into faster render times. Efficiency gains are tangible and meaningful.

At the end of the day: the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD secures this showdown convincingly. Consumers prioritizing performance might definitely select the AMD EPYC 8024P chip from AMD over 6333P from Intel. This score data confirms this conclusion. The scenarios should improve from the stronger performance. It's a clear champion in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8024P
6333P
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
16
12 -25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
3.1 +29.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
5.2 +73.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
3.1 +29.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
5.2 +73.3%
Multiplier
24
31 +29.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
90
65 -27.8%
Configurable TDP
70-100 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Raptor Lake
Codename
Siena
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Xeon 6 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,875 million
Die Size
73 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
C262, C266
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$409
$319
Part Number
100-000001136
SRPLV
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
View EPYC 8024P Details View Xeon 6333P Details