AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests in the database?

A: The AMD EPYC 8024P wins 11 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE wins 6. The AMD part leads in every Cinebench test and in several Passmark workloads including data compression, data encryption, multithread, physics, and random string sorting.

Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two chips?

A: The AMD EPYC 8024P records an average benchmark score of 26,555, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core i7-14701TE averages 26,013, also in the 78th percentile. The AMD part's nearest rival is the Intel Core i9-11900K at 26,639 (0.3% higher), while the Intel part's closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS at 26,106 (0.4% lower).

Q: How do the two processors compare in single-threaded performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE is clearly ahead in Passmark single-thread tests, scoring 2,637 versus 2,371 for the AMD EPYC 8024P, a 10.1% advantage. However, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the AMD part scores 2,466 versus 2,405 for Intel, giving AMD a 2.5% lead.

Q: Which chip has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE boosts to 5.20 GHz, compared to 3.00 GHz for the AMD EPYC 8024P. Despite this large clock advantage, Intel only wins 6 of the 17 benchmark comparisons, suggesting the AMD architecture compensates effectively in many workloads.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The AMD EPYC 8024P supports DDR5 memory over a six-channel bus with 230.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, and the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD EPYC 8024P and the Intel Core i7-14701TE support ECC memory. This makes both viable for error-sensitive server or workstation workloads.

Architecture Differences

The AMD EPYC 8024P and Intel Core i7-14701TE represent fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD's chip uses the Zen 4c architecture, codenamed Siena, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Intel's part uses Raptor Lake, codenamed Raptor Lake-R, manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The process node difference is stark, and it shows in the transistor density: AMD packs 8,875 million transistors into a 73 mm² die, while Intel's die is 257 mm² with no transistor count listed in the database.

Both processors have 8 cores and 16 threads, but their cache hierarchies differ. The AMD part provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3. The Intel part offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3. Intel's per-core cache allocations are larger, yet AMD's overall benchmark results remain competitive.

The memory subsystems diverge sharply. AMD supports DDR5 only, over a six-channel bus, delivering 230.4 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, but only over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded. For memory-heavy server workloads, the AMD part's six-channel design provides a clear theoretical advantage.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD EPYC 8024P offers Gen 5 with 96 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel Core i7-14701TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This is a major distinction for server expansion, as the AMD part can drive far more peripherals directly from the CPU.

The Intel chip includes integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 770, while the AMD EPYC 8024P has no integrated graphics listed. The AMD part targets the Server/Workstation market segment, whereas Intel's chip is categorized as Desktop. The AMD processor also has a higher TDP at 90 watts versus 45 watts for Intel, reflecting its server-oriented power envelope.

Socket compatibility differs completely: the AMD part uses AMD Socket SP6, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD chip launched in September 2023 with a launch MSRP of $409; the Intel chip launched in June 2024 with no MSRP recorded.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results reveal a nuanced picture. The AMD EPYC 8024P dominates the Cinebench suite, winning all six tests by narrow margins. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, AMD scores 1,761 against Intel's 1,716, a 2.6% edge. The single-core R15 result is similar: 248 versus 242, a 2.5% lead. R20 multi-core shows 7,338 versus 7,154 (2.6%), and R20 single-core shows 1,035 versus 1,010 (2.5%). R23 multi-core gives AMD 17,472 versus 17,035 (2.6%), and R23 single-core gives 2,466 versus 2,405 (2.5%).

The AMD part's largest win comes in Passmark random string sorting, where it scores 34,613 versus 22,760 for Intel, a massive 52.1% advantage. Data encryption also favors AMD heavily: 15,809 versus 11,699, a 35.1% gap. Data compression shows AMD ahead by 5.3%, with 232,242 versus 220,520. Passmark multithread gives AMD 20,556 versus 20,042 (2.6%), and physics gives 1,905 versus 1,860 (2.4%).

The Intel Core i7-14701TE counters in several math-heavy workloads. Its biggest win is in floating point math, scoring 50,219 versus 34,757 for AMD, a 30.8% advantage. Find prime numbers also favors Intel: 143 versus 109, a 23.8% lead. Integer math goes to Intel by 5.6%, with 65,792 versus 62,128. Extended instructions are nearly tied, with Intel ahead by just 0.7% (14,354 versus 14,251). Single-thread tests show Intel ahead by 10.1%, with 2,637 versus 2,371.

The overall pattern is clear: AMD wins the majority of tests, especially those involving encryption, compression, and sorting, while Intel excels at raw arithmetic and single-threaded integer workloads. The 11-to-6 win count in AMD's favor reflects its broader competence across diverse benchmark categories.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification category in the database. The AMD EPYC 8024P has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.00 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has a base of 2.10 GHz and a boost of 5.20 GHz. TDP differs significantly: 90 watts for AMD versus 45 watts for Intel.

Process node and foundry differ: AMD uses 5 nm at TSMC, Intel uses 10 nm at Intel. The AMD die is 73 mm² with 8,875 million transistors; the Intel die is 257 mm² with no transistor count recorded. Socket types are entirely different: AMD Socket SP6 versus Intel Socket 1700.

Memory support differs: AMD uses DDR5 only with six channels and 230.4 GB/s bandwidth; Intel uses DDR4 and DDR5 with dual channels and no bandwidth listed. PCIe lanes differ: AMD provides 96 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides 16 Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are present on Intel (UHD Graphics 770) but absent on AMD.

Cache configurations differ per-core: AMD has 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core; Intel has 80 KB L1 and 2 MB L2 per core. Shared L3 is 32 MB on AMD and 33 MB on Intel. Market segments differ: AMD is Server/Workstation, Intel is Desktop. Release dates differ: AMD launched in September 2023, Intel in June 2024. The AMD part has a launch MSRP of $409; Intel has no recorded MSRP. Both are Active in production status, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear division of use cases. The AMD EPYC 8024P is the stronger choice for server and workstation deployments requiring broad multi-threaded performance, memory bandwidth, and PCIe expansion. Its six-channel DDR5 support and 96 PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it suitable for systems needing extensive I/O. Its wins in encryption, compression, and sorting workloads suggest it handles data-centric tasks efficiently. The 35.1% lead in data encryption and 52.1% lead in random string sorting are decisive advantages in those specific operations.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE is the better option for desktop workloads that prioritize single-threaded responsiveness and floating-point arithmetic. Its 10.1% lead in Passmark single-thread tests and 30.8% lead in floating point math indicate it excels in applications that depend on high clock speeds and per-core performance. The 45-watt TDP also makes it a lower-power choice for desktop systems.

The overall average benchmark scores are close, with AMD at 26,555 and Intel at 26,013, a difference of roughly 2%. Both sit in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. However, the AMD part wins 11 of 17 head-to-head tests, suggesting its performance is more consistently strong across varied workloads. The Intel part wins 6 tests, but those wins include some of the largest margins in either direction.

For buyers prioritizing server features like ECC memory, six-channel bandwidth, and massive PCIe lane count, the AMD EPYC 8024P is the data-backed choice. For desktop users who want integrated graphics, lower power draw, and superior single-thread and floating-point performance, the Intel Core i7-14701TE is the rational pick. The benchmark database does not indicate a single winner across all scenarios; it shows two processors designed for different environments, each leading in the areas that matter most for their respective markets.