CPU Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 32 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 90W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core 5 120

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-R
CORE SPECS 6 Cores / 12 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.5 Base / 4.5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 18 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
1,761
1,840
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
248
259
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
7,338
7,667
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,035
1,082
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
17,472
18,255
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
2,466
2,577
passmark_data_compression
232,242
219,535
passmark_data_encryption
15,809
11,131
passmark_extended_instructions
14,251
14,264
passmark_find_prime_numbers
109
77
passmark_floating_point_math
34,757
45,383
passmark_integer_math
62,128
60,462
passmark_multithread
20,556
18,597
passmark_physics
1,905
1,333
passmark_random_string_sorting
34,613
21,499
passmark_single_thread
2,371
3,595
passmark_singlethread
2,371
3,595

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core 5 120

This comparison between AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor and Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU reveals impressively matched performance. Both chips achieve similar numbers in the majority of workloads, leaving this decision mainly reliant on availability. This test results validates this assessment. No CPU maintains a definitive lead. Consumers can select based on alternative factors.

Not one option maintains a definitive superiority here. AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor beats barely in some tests, while Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU secures alternative tests. This trading trend indicates fundamental equivalence between the processors. The deltas are small and probably imperceptible in everyday tasks. Either deliver capable results.

For those conflicted between AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor and Intel Intel Core 5 120 CPU, be comfortable that both choice offers matching capability. The performance results demonstrates nil obvious champion. Make your choice on secondary considerations and enjoy excellent results regardless. The two are champions in this respective way. Pick confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
EPYC 8024P
5 120
Core Specs
Cores
8
6 -25.0%
Threads
16
12 -25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Boost Clock (GHz)
3
4.5 +50.0%
Frequency (GHz)
2.4
2.5 +4.2%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
3
4.5 +50.0%
Multiplier
24
25 +4.2%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
32 MB (shared)
18 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
90
65 -27.8%
PL1
65 W
PL2
110 W
Configurable TDP
70-100 W
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 4c
Raptor Lake
Codename
Siena
Raptor Lake-R
Generation
EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))
Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Process Size
5 nm
10 nm
Transistors
8,875 million
Die Size
73 mm²
163 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Six-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
230.4 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
Intel 600 Series, Intel 700 Series
PCIe
Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
6 nm
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
Other
Market
Server/Workstation
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$409
$211
Part Number
100-000001136
SA35V
Package
FC-LGA4844
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
Bundled Cooler
None
Laminar RM1
View EPYC 8024P Details View Core 5 120 Details