CPU Comparison

AMD

AMD EPYC 8024P

CORE STATE Siena

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.4 Base / 3 GHz Turbo

CACHE 32 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 90W

ARCHITECTURE Zen 4c

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

INTEL

Core 3 100HL

CORE STATE Raptor Lake-PS

CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 12 Threads

CLOCK SPEED 2.1 Base / 4.6 GHz Turbo

CACHE 12 MB (shared)

MAX TDP 45W

ARCHITECTURE Raptor Lake

PROCESS 10 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore

1,761

1,506

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore

248

212

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore

7,338

6,278

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore

1,035

886

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore

17,472

14,948

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore

2,466

2,110

passmark_data_compression

232,242

202,225

passmark_data_encryption

15,809

11,964

passmark_extended_instructions

14,251

12,463

passmark_find_prime_numbers

109

passmark_floating_point_math

34,757

42,108

passmark_integer_math

62,128

56,308

passmark_multithread

20,556

17,586

passmark_physics

1,905

928

passmark_random_string_sorting

34,613

23,223

passmark_single_thread

2,371

3,735

passmark_singlethread

2,371

3,735

Analysis: AMD EPYC 8024P vs Intel Core 3 100HL

During this direct evaluation, AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor emerges as the clear winner. The benchmark data demonstrate substantial gaps in most single-threaded scenarios. Whether you're putting together a gaming PC, AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor gives superior capability for the price. This CPU manages demanding workloads with capability. It's notably clear in actual tests.

This score delta between AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor and Intel Intel Core 3 100HL CPU gets especially clear in concurrent scenarios. Applications like code compilation showcase AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor's strengths. The extra execution units offer notable headroom for resource-hungry workloads. This power converts into reduced execution durations. Efficiency improvements are real and substantial.

Intel Intel Core 3 100HL CPU isn't written off altogether, however its performance gap against AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor is tough to dismiss. For cost-sensitive builders, Intel Intel Core 3 100HL CPU might yet offer a choice provided its lower price makes up for its lower power. That said, when raw performance, AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor stands as the definite choice. The conclusion is evident. Power chasers will move toward AMD AMD EPYC 8024P processor.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

EPYC 8024P

3 100HL

Core Specs

Cores

8 0.0%

Threads

12 -25.0%

Base Clock (GHz)

2.4

2.1 -12.5%

Boost Clock (GHz)

4.6 +53.3%

Frequency (GHz)

2.4

2.1 -12.5%

Turbo Clock (GHz)

4.6 +53.3%

Multiplier

21 -12.5%

SMP CPUs

1 0.0%

Cache

L1 Cache

64 KB (per core)

80 KB (per core)

L2 Cache

1 MB (per core)

2 MB (per core)

L3 Cache

32 MB (shared)

12 MB (shared)

Power

TDP (W)

45 -50.0%

PL1

—

45 W

PL2

—

115 W

Configurable TDP

70-100 W

—

Architecture

Zen 4c

Raptor Lake

Codename

Siena

Raptor Lake-PS

Generation

EPYC (Zen 4c (Siena))

Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS)

Process Size

5 nm

10 nm

Transistors

8,875 million

—

Die Size

73 mm²

—

Foundry

TSMC

Intel

Memory

Memory Support

DDR5

DDR4, DDR5

Memory Bus

Six-channel

Dual-channel

Memory Bandwidth

230.4 GB/s

—

ECC Memory

Yes

DDR4 Speed

—

3200 MT/s

DDR5 Speed

—

5200 MT/s

Platform

Socket

AMD Socket SP6

Intel Socket 1700

PCIe

Gen 5, 96 Lanes(CPU only)

Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only)

Intel Hybrid

Hybrid Cores

—

P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 4

E-Core Frequency

—

1500 MHz up to 3.4 GHz

AMD Multi-Die

IO Process Size

6 nm

—

Graphics

Integrated Graphics

—

Iris Xe Graphics 48EU

Other

Market

Server/Workstation

Desktop

Production Status

Active

Launch Price

$409

—

Part Number

100-000001136

unknown

Package

FC-LGA4844

FC-LGA16A

Tj Max

—

100°C

Bundled Cooler

None

—

View EPYC 8024P Details View Core 3 100HL Details